Quantcast
Channel: NO REST FOR THE AWAKE - MINAGAHET CHAMORRO
Viewing all 862 articles
Browse latest View live

Hellraising in Hagatna

$
0
0
 Even though almost everyone in the world will probably tell you that democracy is the greatest system of government in the world, that doesn't mean that people don't loathe it. People will generally loathe their own particular forms of democracy and only praise or love it when its existence is being shaded or overshadowed by some competing alternative. But even though they may loathe the ideas of Senators, Mayors, Governors or Presidents as being positions that are often held by cheats and liars, they tend to either tolerate or like the people who actually hold those positions. In a purely commonsensical level you might assume that since Congress is so incredibly unpopular, people would be in a hurry to vote out all incumbents and bring in fresh blood. You may think that since nearly everyone on Guam complains about Senators or Governors as being self-interested crooks who don't do anything more than wave by roadsides, no one in Guam's history would ever get re-elected. You would be completely wrong on both accounts. The unpopularity for the governing body or irritation with the system doesn't always affect the leaders themselves. Often times people like them or connect to them, even if they are spitting fiery tirades at the system they belong to.
 
This has come to mind because of the recent controversy over pay raises for elected officials and cabinet members. You can check out the articles and statements below to learn more about what is going on.

*************************

Pay raise flap not over: San Nicolas to reintroduce bill in next Legislature
by Shawn Raymundo
Dec. 11, 2014
Pacific Daily News

During the next Legislative term, Sen. Michael San Nicolas, D-Dededo, will reintroduce a bill to repeal a recently enacted law that gives elected and appointed officials pay raises.

Bill 435-32 was aimed at repealing Public Law 32-208, which raised the annual salaries of the governor, lieutenant governor, cabinet members and senators based on recommendations from the Competitive Wage Act of 2014. In addition to their raises, the officials will receive retroactive payment dating back to January.

San Nicolas introduced the proposed legislation Tuesday.

Vice Speaker Benjamin Cruz, D-Piti, and San Nicolas were the only lawmakers in favor of the bill. The nine remaining senators voted against it.

Speaker Judith Won Pat, D-Inarajan as well as Sens. Tina Muña Barnes, D-Mangilao, and Mike Limtiaco, R-Tamuning, were absent from Tuesday night's session.

"We always ask 'where are we going to find the money?' But yet we can find it when we're talking about raises and pay being retroactive?" San Nicolas asked Tuesday, referring to sessions held in the past over funding issues with various agencies.

San Nicolas said, although his bill had minimal support at the end of this term, he would like to hear input from the new senators who will be part of the upcoming Legislature.

The four new senators and other incumbent lawmakers will be sworn in next month.

"I think it will be good for us to get the perspective of the newly elected senators and weigh in on it," he said.

Unlike the pay raise bill, which senators passed on Nov. 21 in a 10-1 vote, San Nicolas said he will make sure his bill in the 33rd Legislature goes through the proper procedure of introduction, public hearing and then deliberation on the floor.

"We're definitely going to put that through the full course," San Nicolas said.

San Nicolas slammed lawmakers Tuesday night for not holding a public hearing prior to passing last month's bill. He wanted his bill to receive the same treatment.

Implementation

Under the new law that Lt. Gov. Ray Tenorio enacted late last month, senators received a nearly 40-percent raise, as they will soon be taking home an annual salary of $85,000. The governor and lieutenant governor now have their salaries set at $130,000 and $110,000 respectively.

Gov. Eddie Calvo told members of the media yesterday he would like to see the retroactive payment and paychecks reflecting the raise go out before Christmas.

He said, however, it all depends on when GovGuam's fiscal team completes its financial review of the raises.

"I'm waiting for my fiscal team; I told them just get it calculated," Calvo said. "And I told them I'd like to do it before Christmas."

The fiscal team includes the Department of Administration and Bureau of Budget and Management Research.

Calvo added that he, along with his appointed officials, deserve a raise and added that his Cabinet members were cheated earlier this year when lawmakers excluded themselves and the appointed officials from the Wage Act raises.

The Wage Act, submitted to senators in January, included recommended pay raises to government of Guam employees.

"I think my people deserve a raise," Calvo said, adding, "I believe I do deserve a raise."

Calvo said he plans to use the raise to help pay for his kids' college education and would also contribute to various charities.

Calvo also said he instructed Tenorio, who was acting governor, to call the Legislature into special session last month because senators weren't moving forward with legislation to get Cabinet members their raises.

"I've been preaching on this since January, since (senators) first tinkered around with it. I've always been wanting to get this thing on the floor," Calvo said. "Obviously no one's moving on it so I decided moving on it."

Public reaction

On Tuesday, San Nicolas cited several issues around the island that should be addressed before the elected officials and Cabinet members receive raises. He pointed out that the transit system is underfunded, and there are many roads in need of repairs.

Island resident Pauline Gumataotao, who works as a clerk in Piti, agreed with San Nicolas that elected officials shouldn't be getting pay raises while the island faces issues with its infrastructure.
"There's a lot of stuff that needs to be fixed up," she said, such as "buildings that are eyesores and roads that need to be fixed."

She said only Cabinet members who can prove to the public that they have been working hard to make improvements to the island deserve a pay increase.

Resident Jared Aguon, a 24-year-old delivery driver for Luen Fung Enterprises, a food supply company, doesn't agree with the raises either because he said they already earn enough money.
"I don't like it," he said. "I don't think they need the pay raises. The wealthy is already wealthy."
Even with the pay raises, Calvo said GovGuam is in position to take care of the needs of the island. He added that during his first term in Adelup, he has been able to improve government agencies such as Guam Memorial Hospital and the Guam Police Department.

"This doesn't mean we neglect the goals of those agencies," Calvo said.

***********************************

Hafa Adai,
My name is Shannon Siguenza and I am a 28 year old resident of Agana Heights. I teach psychology at the high school level and dedicate much of my time to community rugby and other community organizations to improve our island and restore balance to an island that is far from healthy. This is not my first time writing to the 32nd Guahan Legislature. Through experience, I’ve found that not all of my messages make it into the hands of their intended recipients; that, or as a regular everyday person, my concerns weren’t important enough for your time or energy. It is truly my hope that these words meet the eyes of each member of the legislature. I pray these words sit in your conscience and that your hearts make decisions as quickly as your hands emptied our pockets.
A servant is a devoted and helpful follower or supporter. It is my understanding that being a public servant would require helpfulness and support that benefits the public. After all, it was only through the people’s help that you possess any power at all. Our island is in need of so many things, it is no secret to anyone. YOU are the people the island depends on to support us in our needs, to help us in our struggles, to devote yourselves to improving the island for generations to come.
Our public school system is failing! FAILING! Proof that you are aware of this too, is the number of you in the government who send your children to private schools. And you ask us to trust in the public school system that you won’t send your own children to? Teachers are working with few resources, if any, while sports and afterschool programs lack attention and funding. A few weeks ago, I watched a heart breaking video of a boy slamming a girls head on a sidewalk. More disturbing than the act itself, was the fact that someone stood there and FILMED it, instead of calling for help or assisting in some way. Education dictates the movement of a people! The improvement, the growth and restoration of our island depends on our youth being knowledgeable and empowered! How have you devoted yourself to helping us achieve this?
The Guam Memorial Hospital and Behavioral Health and Wellness Center are hurting so badly. The vicious cycle that is created through a lack of education and a lack of community support is poisoning every part of our daily lives. As you continue to fail us, the uneducated and struggling members of our community live each day without purpose, unproductive and at risk for substance abuse which leads to an array of more problems. What have you done to provide our people with better health and behavioral wellness options?
Culture and language education and perpetuation programs also have the power and ability to restore a society that is barely hanging on to its last thread and yet, these programs have been neglected too. Not only do these programs restore identity and empower individuals, they also help with tourism, which is widely known to be our islands main source of income. What have you done to help our people with opportunities to know their culture and history and to share that unique heritage as a means to sustain the island?
As leaders, you often blame the failures in our broken systems on a lack of funding. There is no funding to give each teacher more than a ream of paper each quarter. There is no funding for sports programs. There is no funding for medical professionals and programs. There is no funding for behavioral health professionals. There is no funding for culture and language perpetuation and education. There is no funding.
As a public servant, someone who is supposed to support us in our needs, help us in our struggles, can you truly justify your recent legislation for pay increases? Are these pay raises part of your devotion to us? Do they, in any way, fulfill the promises that you made when you were asking for our help in the way of votes and support? Do these pay raises help the island? There is no doubt in my mind that you know the answer just as well as I do. I’m calling on you to be that servant that you promised you would be. Taking those raises is plainly as evil as stealing the food off a starving child’s plate.
I know that some of you work extremely hard and that some of you deserve better pay for the work that is done for the island. We all deserve better, but the larger question is CAN WE AFFORD IT?
Please consider all that is truly good for Guahan and her people and take appropriate action concerning the law to raise wages. Introduce a new law re-appropriating that money toward a greater need in our government, like the hospital, behavioral health and wellness, or schools. I am also appalled by the fact that many of you denied the pay raise earlier this year to save our government money and ensure that other government workers received their raises. If you did this in good faith, then why should you also be given retro pay for this time in which you refused a raise? I urge you to also repeal your retro pay.
I close with a reading from Matthew 25: 35-40:
For I was hungry and you gave me something to eat, I was thirsty and you gave me something to drink, I was a stranger and you invited me in, I needed clothes and you clothed me, I was sick and you looked after me, I was in prison and you came to visit me.
The righteous will answer him, ‘Lord, when did we see you hungry and feed you, or thirsty and give you something to drink? When did we see you a stranger and invite you in, or needing clothes and clothe you? When did we see you sick or in prison to visit you?
The King will reply, ‘Truly, I tell you, whatever you did for one of the least of these brothers and sisters of mine, you did for me.’
Be greater than those that came before you, because there are thousands of futures that lay in your care. I hope that your decisions will move the entire island and her people in a direction that is good for ALL of us.
Saina Ma’ase’,
Shannon Siguenza


***********************

Raises show imprudence, greed

Dec. 4, 2014

Season's Greetings from The F.I. Report. Here we go again; a special legislative session was convened at the request of Lt. Gov. Ray Tenorio. Our senators voted to give themselves (and other elected and appointed officials) fat, retroactive pay raises.

Do you recall if there was a public hearing to discuss the merits of the bill? I don't. It was passed and signed into law in record time and without shame it seems. Man tai mamalao.

Two years ago, senators voted themselves a raise from $55,000 to $65,000. Now it will be $85,000 a year -- with back pay.

The governor's pay will go from $90,000 to $130,000, while the lieutenant governor's will go from $85,000 to $110,000.

Wow!

Host of problems

Our kids are brawling on campuses, classrooms are vandalized and we can't seem to improve school security. Our health care system is substandard and GMH cannot pay its bills.

Our streets become increasingly unsafe because of a shortage of police officers. Police cars and fire engines need regular maintenance, but there is no money for oil changes. The Department of Corrections is vastly overcrowded and ever so closer to federal receivership.

Our educators are struggling to meet student demands and often have to dip into their own pockets for supplies. The air conditioners and vehicles need maintenance, but there is no budget for the basics.

The Hagåtña library is closed because of a failed air-conditioning system, while they await a $600,000 grant from the Department of Interior.

All these failings are evidence of continuing fiscal problems. They don't fund necessities, yet blithely delude themselves that we are operating in the black.

How can they justify the fat, retroactive pay adjustments? Are they imprudent or just greedy?

The pay raise will cost additional millions of dollars but the lieutenant governor does not know how much. He responded to a KUAM interview question concerning the cost of the pay increase, plus back pay: "It's not a single, well it is going to cost $5 million, but will cost X but we don't know the X yet but we'll get that answer to you."

Are you confused like I am? Bad move for a gubernatorial hopeful who might plan to run in four years.

Shouldn't salary increases be a reflection of good performance? I'm searching but don't see it.

What'll be next?

I can't help but wonder what's next. Borrow more money to pay for operational expenses?

I suggest that the pay raises be axed and that some courageous senator introduce a bill to retroactively reverse the fat pay checks.

I applaud Sen. Mike Limtiaco for voting against it. He cast the one and only opposing vote.
We are not out of the financial woods, folks -- we have borrowed to the maximum allowable limits and the monthly payments of additional millions of dollars is just around the corner.

During the urgent "special session," Vice Speaker Benjamin J. Cruz inquired about the funding source for these raises. According to KUAM, my old friend Tony Blaz said, "We're very confident, vice speaker, we're very confident we'll work within our resources and we have our due diligence at BBMR we're going to do our part."

Did Tony answer the question? I think not. Just how are we going to pay for the early Christmas presents?

All about timing

"Timing is everything!" my FBI recruiter once said to me as I hesitated at his recommendation for me to report to the FBI Academy the following week.

For this maneuver, their timing was exceptional. The call for the special session, the vote without a public hearing, the vote to pass and the quick signing of the bill into law was accomplished within days after the General Election.

Matson lines just announced a rate increase, so the cost of rice, Spam and ramen will go up. Our wise leaders will be eating steaks and lobsters while the rest of us count our pennies.

By next election, we will have forgotten about their slick maneuver. They are counting on poor collective memory, but we shall remind them.

I welcome your comments.
Frank Ishizaki is a retired FBI special agent, chief of police, Homeland Security adviser, director of Corrections, senator and CSI. He can be contacted at friendscrimelab@live.com.

******************

‘Pay raises deserved’

GOV. Eddie Calvo yesterday said the recent pay raises for elected officials and political appointees established by P.L. 32-208 was a move he supported, and he believes he and his appointees deserve a raise.

“I believe my people deserve a raise,” Calvo said. “I do believe I do deserve a raise but a raise that was not calculated by me but by a group that the government of Guam paid good money for.”

On Dec. 3, Simon Sanchez High School teacher Andre Baynum started circulating a petition online pleading with politicians to repeal the new law with respect to elected officials.

More than 800 people yesterday signed the petition as of 7 p.m. Baynum wrote that the law is “an affront to the general public on Guam who continue to endure substandard results on social and economical issues facing the island.”

Baynum told Variety he thought the pay raises are “unconscionable.”

Calvo, however, said the pay raises are deserved for the people in the government and are needed to stabilize inequities among the wages between autonomous agencies and line agencies.

The timing of the bill, Calvo said, was to ensure the issue was not politicized as it was in the beginning of the year. “Unfortunately, Sen. (Michael San Nicolas) has politicized the issue again.”

San Nicolas introduced a bill to repeal P.L. 32-208 on Tuesday but the measure failed to pass during Tuesday’s special session.

Not forgotten

Calvo said he has not forgotten about the other issues on Guam, including dilapidated roads and the condition of Guam Memorial Hospital. He said under his governance, he’s been able to repair roads, add police equipment, add police officers and improve conditions at the hospital.

“Rome was not built in a day,” Calvo said. “I’m seeing improvement and obviously we have to do a lot more but it also means as we improve, we pay the people the fair worth of their salt.”

All the government employees received wage increases according to the Hay Group’s study completed in 2010 and the elected officials were initially taken out at the beginning of this year. Calvo said he has been fighting for this raise since the beginning of the year and he advised the legislature in February not to tinker with the Competitive Wage Act of 2014.

However, now that the act has been tinkered with, Calvo said continued tinkering will further cause inequities among government employees’ salaries. “My recommendation is this: If they’re going to continue to fool around and kill off the portions that we put back, then maybe we should consider everything,” Calvo said. “Then maybe we consider just taking everybody’s pay increase away and look at autonomous agencies and start from square one. I don’t think we should do it but in order to create harmony and equity, to ensure we don’t cause an imbalance.”

Calvo said he’ll donate his salary as he and his wife decide.

On retroactively paying the salaries, the governor also said they should have been paid since the beginning. “I think these hard-working government employees that were excluded in January were cheated,” he said.

Klas Mamfok

$
0
0
This semester I was very excited to offer a new course, Tiningo' Tinifok at UOG, which focused on teaching the basics for weaving. We had 12 students for the class, who learned how to weave a variety of objects in both hagon niyok (coconut leaf) and akgak (pandanus). I look forward to offering more courses like this in the future, which focus on material culture and traditional knowledge and make academic connections between the two.

Here are some images from the class:





Teaching Privileged White Kids

$
0
0

This Is What It Means For Me To Teach Your White, Privileged Kids


A month after protesting in Ferguson, this Black, Harvard-educated literature professor has been teaching at one of the nation's most elite boarding schools. Can she make a difference?
  

Written by
I'm an educator. I teach English at one of the top independent boarding schools in the world. I'm also a Black woman. With a Masters in English, which qualifies me to teach it, and a Ph.D. in African-American Studies from Harvard University, which, among other things, scares the shit out of everyone.

Yet, here I am, in rural New England, teaching the literature of my choice and with an interdisciplinary bent (read: African-American) and how to write the personal essay to a mostly White, upper-class population.

And this is a good thing.

When applying to grad schools I wrote in my personal statement that my presence in a classroom is a revolutionary act. I fill a space of authority that is still very much White, male and very, very privileged. When I visited my current school's campus and saw the alumnae list full of governors, Supreme Court justices and presidents I felt emboldened. What ran through my head would become a recurrent mantra since my time here, “I'm here for the White boys.”

In August, a month, before starting my job I'd visited Ferguson. I snuck into Governor Jay Nixon's first press conference to address the recent riots following the killing of Michael Brown. I watched him speak. It was one of the saddest and most enraging scenes I've ever witnessed. I won't even address the things he said or, rather, didn’t say. By now, we're aware of his urging for townsfolk to "go to sleep" while the National Guard took control. His body language at the press conference was just as offensive. There was a moment where he seemed to hide behind one of the Black officials. He never made eye contact with any actual human present.

I remember thinking, This man has never dealt with a Black person in his life.

I'm sure he's existed among Black people: The people who clicked his ticket on the train, put his items into the grocery bag, panhandlers on the street as he as his driver waited for the light to change.

I remember thinking, He has never had anyone like me in his life in a position of authority, in a position higher than his.

So while it was absolutely jarring to go from this—from scenes of razed buildings, burned-down gas stations, and from the memorial site where a boy's dead body lay bleeding on the street under the blue sky for four-and-a-half hours to a nearly 300-year-old, billion-dollar-endowed institution and sit in meetings where colleagues happily discussed their child's first bike ride or another's trip down South to discover his forefather's Civil War roots, I felt a strong resolve that I was in the right place. That I was there for the White boys.

I'm here for the Black girls and boys, too, so that if, for nothing else, they can see a Black woman exerting authority in a manner and in a space not traditionally filled by us. This particular institution is faculty led. The administration is also the faculty, decisions are not passed down—they are shared. In other words, I am not just an English teacher, I'm among the keepers of the gates.

And they need to see me here for the White boys.

Sure, Whites see us putting on Band-Aids to scraped knees, pushing baby carriages, herding the very, very small children of others, doling out their peas and carrots and Happy Meals. In fact, around here, usually other Whites tend to fill these roles. That doesn’t mean the kids see Whites in more diverse roles—they do but it's not registered that way. Rather, Black people become completely disappeared in their surroundings and their imaginations.  The students go home and see Blacks in our usual lesser-than spaces or they simply don’t see us at all. Maybe they see us on screens dancing, running, singing, and every once in a while, one of us as a head of State.

This position I'm in is fraught with anxiety—of constantly wondering, of fretting—that every single statement I make, movement I make, facial expression I let loose—is just right. Such a nervous state is nothing new. At 32, most minorities in mixed spaces have become professionals at this chameleon effect.

What is not as typical is when this—the pricelessness of mastering how to be Black in White spaces, spaces that can and do deny my existence—is duly recognized by Whites.

My advisee's father, a White man, told me it was important to him that I was his son's advisor because he wanted his son to have exposure to people's different perspectives and backgrounds before he's in college, specifically before he was 19 years old. In my 32 years here I was faced with a man who was not asking me to teach his son about blackness, no. Rather, he was sharing with me his desire that his son be exposed and guided by that which he could not offer him in their hometown: In short, that his son see difference differently. By age 19, a young adult's thinking becomes more abstract and less tied to reality. This man wants his privileged White son to have me in his imaginative and mental maps as part of his developing basis for his future decision-making.

This was a father expressing a deep need for his son to grow into a White man who might just rise above his race and to be a global citizen; to have empathy, to question more than answer, and to have a Black woman be his guide. It was as uplifting a moment for me as it was humbling.

That was in October. It is now a week since Darren Wilson was not indicted by a grand jury for shooting and killing Michael Brown. A week since he testified that he felt as if Brown was an “it,” “a demon” that would not die. A colleague tells me she and her husband are taking their 1-year-old son apple-picking. An old high-school friend posts pictures of a warm, wholesome Thanksgiving dinner. I want to scream,Fuck your apples! Fuck your turkey! Fuck your holidays! Fuck your smiles! Fuck you! Fuck. Your. Children. Since the grand jury's announcement I've been simultaneously addicted to and repulsed by social media. Professionally, I have no business on Facebook when there are stacks of papers to grade. Yet, that's also what feeds my ire: How can I do anything, how can anyone do anything remotely normal like motherfucking apple-picking?

How can I teach at this world-renowned private institution to these privileged White kids? What does that even do?

As a follow-up to our meeting I'd emailed the parents thanking them for such a rewarding exchange. The mother wrote me back: "The lack of diversity of religion, race, and opinion in rural Vermont has been a real concern for both of us. I am pleased to hear that your advisory group has discussed the situation in Ferguson (which echoes situations across the country and across the world). [Our son] has the opportunity to hear from fellow students in advisory who have a variety of backgrounds both international and domestic, Black and White. I do not know what other diversity is present in your advisory group, but I hope that his experience on campus causes him to think frequently about other people and expands his worldview beyond that of Vermont, America, White, and male. We are a very privileged group. It's one thing to know it intellectually. We have to hear other people's stories to begin to internalize what that really means and how we can effect real and significant change in this world. Thank you for helping my children to grow as human beings by mentoring them, by teaching them, by facilitating their experiences, by sharing part of who you are with them."

I keep returning to this note, to help remind me that what I'm doing is worth it, worth the pain and frustration.

This essay has been particularly painful and frustrating to write. And I cannot articulate exactly why. I can say I am deeply anxious that, in telling this, White people will feel good about themselves. You'll read that encouraging note from a White family and think, See, that's how I feel, too. Yes, we are good people, doing good things. My fear is that when White people feel good about themselves you think that the problem is solved. It is not.

Remember, it's only once you start feeling uncomfortable that we're getting anywhere. Remember, Darren Wilson had a defense fund. Remember that what you will not see are the many White folks who will shake his hand.

So I share that heartfelt message with you and then I want to remind you that it also doesn’t mean shit.

Linda Chavers is this week's guest columnist for "What's Going On."
- See more at: http://damemagazine.com/2014/11/30/what-it-means-me-teach-your-white-privileged-kids#sthash.moJYnYrA.dpuf
-->
This Is What It Means For Me To Teach Your White, Privileged Kids
Written by Linda Chavers
http://damemagazine.com/2014/11/30/what-it-means-me-teach-your-white-privileged-kids
11/30/2014 

I'm an educator. I teach English at one of the top independent boarding schools in the world. I'm also a Black woman. With a Masters in English, which qualifies me to teach it, and a Ph.D. in African-American Studies from Harvard University, which, among other things, scares the shit out of everyone.

Yet, here I am, in rural New England, teaching the literature of my choice and with an interdisciplinary bent (read: African-American) and how to write the personal essay to a mostly White, upper-class population.

And this is a good thing.

When applying to grad schools I wrote in my personal statement that my presence in a classroom is a revolutionary act. I fill a space of authority that is still very much White, male and very, very privileged. When I visited my current school's campus and saw the alumnae list full of governors, Supreme Court justices and presidents I felt emboldened. What ran through my head would become a recurrent mantra since my time here, “I'm here for the White boys.”

In August, a month, before starting my job I'd visited Ferguson. I snuck into Governor Jay Nixon's first press conference to address the recent riots following the killing of Michael Brown. I watched him speak. It was one of the saddest and most enraging scenes I've ever witnessed. I won't even address the things he said or, rather, didn’t say. By now, we're aware of his urging for townsfolk to "go to sleep" while the National Guard took control. His body language at the press conference was just as offensive. There was a moment where he seemed to hide behind one of the Black officials. He never made eye contact with any actual human present.

I remember thinking, This man has never dealt with a Black person in his life.

I'm sure he's existed among Black people: The people who clicked his ticket on the train, put his items into the grocery bag, panhandlers on the street as he as his driver waited for the light to change.

I remember thinking, He has never had anyone like me in his life in a position of authority, in a position higher than his.

So while it was absolutely jarring to go from this—from scenes of razed buildings, burned-down gas stations, and from the memorial site where a boy's dead body lay bleeding on the street under the blue sky for four-and-a-half hours to a nearly 300-year-old, billion-dollar-endowed institution and sit in meetings where colleagues happily discussed their child's first bike ride or another's trip down South to discover his forefather's Civil War roots, I felt a strong resolve that I was in the right place. That I was there for the White boys.

I'm here for the Black girls and boys, too, so that if, for nothing else, they can see a Black woman exerting authority in a manner and in a space not traditionally filled by us. This particular institution is faculty led. The administration is also the faculty, decisions are not passed down—they are shared. In other words, I am not just an English teacher, I'm among the keepers of the gates.

And they need to see me here for the White boys.

Sure, Whites see us putting on Band-Aids to scraped knees, pushing baby carriages, herding the very, very small children of others, doling out their peas and carrots and Happy Meals. In fact, around here, usually other Whites tend to fill these roles. That doesn’t mean the kids see Whites in more diverse roles—they do but it's not registered that way. Rather, Black people become completely disappeared in their surroundings and their imaginations.  The students go home and see Blacks in our usual lesser-than spaces or they simply don’t see us at all. Maybe they see us on screens dancing, running, singing, and every once in a while, one of us as a head of State.

This position I'm in is fraught with anxiety—of constantly wondering, of fretting—that every single statement I make, movement I make, facial expression I let loose—is just right. Such a nervous state is nothing new. At 32, most minorities in mixed spaces have become professionals at this chameleon effect.

What is not as typical is when this—the pricelessness of mastering how to be Black in White spaces, spaces that can and do deny my existence—is duly recognized by Whites.

My advisee's father, a White man, told me it was important to him that I was his son's advisor because he wanted his son to have exposure to people's different perspectives and backgrounds before he's in college, specifically before he was 19 years old. In my 32 years here I was faced with a man who was not asking me to teach his son about blackness, no. Rather, he was sharing with me his desire that his son be exposed and guided by that which he could not offer him in their hometown: In short, that his son see difference differently. By age 19, a young adult's thinking becomes more abstract and less tied to reality. This man wants his privileged White son to have me in his imaginative and mental maps as part of his developing basis for his future decision-making.

This was a father expressing a deep need for his son to grow into a White man who might just rise above his race and to be a global citizen; to have empathy, to question more than answer, and to have a Black woman be his guide. It was as uplifting a moment for me as it was humbling.

That was in October. It is now a week since Darren Wilson was not indicted by a grand jury for shooting and killing Michael Brown. A week since he testified that he felt as if Brown was an “it,” “a demon” that would not die. A colleague tells me she and her husband are taking their 1-year-old son apple-picking. An old high-school friend posts pictures of a warm, wholesome Thanksgiving dinner. I want to scream, Fuck your apples! Fuck your turkey! Fuck your holidays! Fuck your smiles! Fuck you! Fuck. Your. Children. Since the grand jury's announcement I've been simultaneously addicted to and repulsed by social media. Professionally, I have no business on Facebook when there are stacks of papers to grade. Yet, that's also what feeds my ire: How can I do anything, how can anyone do anything remotely normal like motherfucking apple-picking?

How can I teach at this world-renowned private institution to these privileged White kids? What does that even do?

As a follow-up to our meeting I'd emailed the parents thanking them for such a rewarding exchange. The mother wrote me back: "The lack of diversity of religion, race, and opinion in rural Vermont has been a real concern for both of us. I am pleased to hear that your advisory group has discussed the situation in Ferguson (which echoes situations across the country and across the world). [Our son] has the opportunity to hear from fellow students in advisory who have a variety of backgrounds both international and domestic, Black and White. I do not know what other diversity is present in your advisory group, but I hope that his experience on campus causes him to think frequently about other people and expands his worldview beyond that of Vermont, America, White, and male. We are a very privileged group. It's one thing to know it intellectually. We have to hear other people's stories to begin to internalize what that really means and how we can effect real and significant change in this world. Thank you for helping my children to grow as human beings by mentoring them, by teaching them, by facilitating their experiences, by sharing part of who you are with them."

I keep returning to this note, to help remind me that what I'm doing is worth it, worth the pain and frustration.

This essay has been particularly painful and frustrating to write. And I cannot articulate exactly why. I can say I am deeply anxious that, in telling this, White people will feel good about themselves. You'll read that encouraging note from a White family and think, See, that's how I feel, too. Yes, we are good people, doing good things. My fear is that when White people feel good about themselves you think that the problem is solved. It is not.

Remember, it's only once you start feeling uncomfortable that we're getting anywhere. Remember, Darren Wilson had a defense fund. Remember that what you will not see are the many White folks who will shake his hand.

So I share that heartfelt message with you and then I want to remind you that it also doesn’t mean shit.

Linda Chavers is this week's guest columnist for "What's Going On."
- See more at: http://damemagazine.com/2014/11/30/what-it-means-me-teach-your-white-privileged-kids#sthash.moJYnYrA.dpuf

I Malago'-hu Para Krismas

$
0
0
Ti este i minagahet put i minalago'-hu para Krismas. Guaha mas malago'-hu para i familia-ku para i manguinaiya-ku siha. Lao gi este na tiempo, anai fihu manstrinessed hit todu, maolek na ta hahasso este na siniente, i nina'chalek gi kuttura-ta.

Gi minagahet sen ti ya-hu bunelos dagu. Ga'o-ku todu i otro klasin bunelos kinu este. Ya-hu bunelos manglo, bunelos aga', bunelos manha, bunelos mangga, bunelos pina. Lao ya-hu na rumhyme dagu yan hagu gi fino' Chamoru. 

Rudof Agaga' Gui'eng-na

$
0
0

I didn’t grow up singing any Chamorro Christmas songs. There was little to no Chamorro in my house growing up in Mangilao. We celebrated Christmas, but didn’t do it in the way that many Chamorros do it. Where it involves a bilen, the creation of a nativity scene, the making of bunelos dagu, or the singing of Chamorro Christmas songs, the majority of which are Catholic in nature. So learning about Chamorro Christmas experiences, the stereotypical, more general kind is bewildering in a way. I am coming into traditions that people who sometimes know far less Chamorro language than I do and much much less Chamorro knowledge or history than I do, know more intimately than I do. To them these experiences are commonplace, are normal, are kind of boring. For me they are interesting. While for most of my students the idea of gathering material for a bilen is irritating and frustrating, it is intriguing to me. Something I would like to do one day, not because of any affection for the nativity scene, but because it would be fun walking around the jungle looking for moss and sticks to build something with my kids.

As part of the UOG Chamorro classes, each December, we organize Puengen Minagof Nochebuena, a central part of which is the singing of Chamorro Christmas songs. The first time I participated in this, I was lost, knowing none of the songs, except for those that were translated from English Christmas songs that I was familiar with. Now, after several years, I know a couple songs by heart and can sing along in a choir with others. This week I joined the Young Men’s League of Guam or YMLG or Inetnon Lalahin Guahan and sang for the sick in GMH. It was lots of fun. I got to join others in belting out a variety of songs, the diversity of which, reminded me of something which always bugs me this time of year.

The “holiday” season nowadays is familiar to all. It is something now embedded into the collective consciousness here. Some of it is spurned on by the same capitalistic fervor that drives other places. Some of it is spurned on by a colonial and Americanizing desire. But ultimately, during the last two months of the year we have a series of rituals and ceremonies that are not intimately tied to people here, but have only been so for a few generations. Thanksgiving was not celebrated by Chamorros as a people prior to World War II. Thanksgiving was something that was taught in schools and was promoted by the US Navy, but it wasn’t something that stopped or dictated the rhythm of Chamorro life. Students were forced to celebrate it in schools, dressing up, even before the war as pilgrims and native Americans. Christmas as we celebrate it today is almost totally unfamiliar to the “Christmas” celebrations of the past. Christmas was primarily a religious celebration and the commercialism and the materialism that inundates life today was absent primarily because of the lack of money on the island. Those wanting to Americanize would try to copy the way things were celebrated in the US, but for most Chamorros, that was a hollow, empty celebration, that was missing what Christmas is supposed to be about, the celebration of Christ’s birth.

I find it both fascinating and depressing as to how fast Chamorros shifted their entire cognitive calendar not to match their own culture, their own history, their own values, but simply to match the way things are done in the US, as part of their desire to assimilate, to prove that they were worthy wards, that they were good and loyal enough to be minor Americans. This is a discussion that few people want to have because of the way it opens up things they would rather take for granted and rather not think about. You can argue that the “spirit” of Christmas is in line with the Chamorro values of gineftao and giving. You can argue that celebrating Christ’s birth is important because of that being a founding myth in Christianity and Catholicism. All of those things can be given, can be accepted. But why take Christmas songs from other places? I understand that certain songs come into Guam via religious beliefs, but why would people on Guam sing songs about snow? Songs about winter wonderlands? Why do people in Guam import and buy Christmas trees from the states? These things only make sense in a rather pathetic assimilationist context. They only make sense if we see Chamorros not really thinking about anything but just wanting to copy American style, do American things, pretend and act like they are Americans.

This is why, I am not sure how I feel about the translation of those ridiculous songs into Chamorro. On the one hand I don’t like it because it is just another way of bringing in colonizing artifacts, but with more local flavor. It is way of ingesting colonialism, but giving it a nice local touch so it doesn’t feel as bitter or silly. But, as someone who translates lots of songs that have nothing to do with Chamorro culture, history or language into Chamorro, the taking of those songs and making them Chamorro is also exciting and interesting. When I look at many of these songs that have been translated, they rework the imagery, the metaphors, the contexts and make them fit within a Chamorro tradition or framework. For example, many of them abandon their original scenery of snow or Christmas elsewhere and focus on Chamorro familial closeness and gatherings. Some however resist this shifting, such as the one below, “Si Rudof” a Chamorro version of Rudolph the Red-Nosed Reindeer. While the story of Santa and Reindeer is just plain stupid, especially when people try to fit it in a Christian framework when Santa has more to do with Odin than Saint Nicolas, I have to admit that just singing a familiar song in Chamorro and seeing the language wrap around it is fun.

Here are the lyrics below, translated by Joe Peredo.

***************


RUDOF
(Rudolph the Red Nose Reindeer) Trinanslåda: J. Peredo

Rudof agaga' i gui'eng-mu
lålamlam kada puengi,
ya kada ma attan i gui'eng-mu,
sigi hao di ma kasse,

todu i mangga'chong-mu,
sigi hao di ma kasse,
sa' hågu ha' nai na binådu,
sasahnge yan na'ma'se'.

Pues un chi'op na puengi,
måtto si Santa Klos,
ha faisen si Ru-dot-fu,
para u giha i karetan gigipu,

Manmagof todu i binådu,
ya ma guaiya ta'lo si Rudof,
put i gui'eng-ña ni kulot agaga',
siempre ma onra hao gi manmamaila'.

Crash...into us

$
0
0
Guam is on the edge of another large buildup of forces. The political stumbling blocks that existed in Washington D.C. for several years, stalling and slowing the US military buildup are now disappearing. The buildup isn't the psychotic, frenetic, diplomatic-cocaine-fueled nightmare that it was almost ten years ago when it was first announced and proposed. It is somewhat smaller and will take place over a longer period. At that time, the focus was on Pagat. Now, new locations have been mixed in, Fena, Litekyan, Pagan and Tinian. These sites were always there on the map of American militarization in the Marianas. There are maps that link them together. There are study documents that discuss and theorize them in tandem. There are lists of resources or assets in the regions that connect them. In some ways, when the US military and its analysts and its decision-makers look at the region, they do a much better job linking locations together than many activists or even average people do. When Pagat was threatened, people had no trouble looking at it and feeling it should be protected (at least at that time). It is interesting to see the response to Litekyan and how it is far more subdued. As if people feel like this should already be over or somehow this is something different. Litekyan is a place that is far more loved in my opinion than Pagat, because it fits the idealized portrait of an island paradisical sanctuary, whereas Pagat is jungle, a cave and a hike. Litekyan is history, culture, beauty, on a beautiful beach that if you sent pictures to your friends elsewhere in the winter world right now, they would be insanely jealous. For Pagat we were able to collect several thousand signatures to protect it. My students alone ended up collecting four thousand. An online petition for Litekyan has a little over 1000.

One thing to be cautious of, during any period of militarization is the likelihood of accidents or catastrophes. As I've written about several times on this blog, during the last period of a heavy increase of activity and training in the region, there were multiple accidents involving aircraft around Guam, several of which cost the lives of military personnel. Here is a list of the incidents and also an article that came out in the UK after one of the accidents took place. Two crashes involving B-2s took place in that year alone, each plane costing more than 1 billion dollars.

*******************


B-52 Bomber
July 2008
Crashed 30 miles northwest of Apra Harbor

B-1 Bomber
March 2008
Collides with two emergency vehicles during a landing

EA6B-Prowler
Feb. 2008
Crashed two miles northeast of Ritidian

B-2 Bomber
Feb. 2008
Crashed shortly after takeoff at Anderson Air Force Base

Helicopter Sea Combat - 25
September 2007
Crashed during a training mission at Fena

2 F/A - 18 Hornets
August 2007
Collide during Valiant Shield traning, are able to land

F/A 18C Hornet
August 2007
Crashed 400 miles southeast of Guam

******************


Published on
by
The Independent on Sunday/UK

The Most Expensive Air Crash in History

by
Raymond Whitaker
Nobody was seriously hurt and no damage was done on the ground. But the crash of a B-2 stealth bomber on the Pacific island of Guam yesterday - the first involving this type of aircraft - was the world's worst air disaster by one measure: money.

Only 22 B-2s have ever been made. The cost of building each one is between $1.2bn (£610m) and $1.3bn, but once development costs are factored in, the figure approaches $2bn per aircraft. By comparison, the British Airways Boeing 777 written off in the Heathrow crash last month (again without serious injury) would have cost around $160m.

The cause of yesterday's crash is unknown. The bat-like B-2 plunged to the ground shortly after take-off from Guam. Both pilots managed to eject safely; one remained in hospital in a stable condition last night. A thick plume of smoke rose from the crash site, but the US Air Force reported no injuries on the ground or damage to buildings.

The crash happened as the B-2 took off with three others on their last flight out of Guam after a four-month deployment, part of a continuous US bomber presence in the western Pacific. The other three aircraft are being kept on Guam pending investigations.

Sixteen B-2 bombers have been used in combat, over Kosovo, Afghanistan and Iran. One mission over Afghanistan in 2001 took 44 hours, with a pair of aircraft taking off from Whiteman Air Force Base, Missouri, where all B-2s are housed, and landing on Diego Garcia in the Indian Ocean after the attack. The aircraft were refueled in flight, and the pilots took it in turn to sleep. It is believed to have been the longest air combat mission ever.

© 2008 independent.co.uk




George Clooney Interview on The Interview

$
0
0
Hollywood Cowardice
A Deadline Interview with George Clooney
Mike Fleming
December 18, 2014

EXCLUSIVE: As it begins to dawn on everyone in Hollywood the reality that Sony Pictures was the victim of a cyberterrorist act perpetrated by a hostile foreign nation on American soil, questions will be asked about how and why it happened, ending with Sony cancelling the theatrical release of the satirical comedy The Interview because of its depiction of North Korean dictator Kim Jong-un. One of those issues will be this: Why didn’t anybody speak out while Sony Pictures chiefs Amy Pascal and Michael Lynton were embarrassed by emails served up by the media, bolstering the credibility of hackers for when they attached as a cover letter to Lynton’s emails a threat to blow up theaters if The Interview was released?
George Clooney has the answer. The most powerful people in Hollywood were so fearful to place themselves in the cross hairs of hackers that they all refused to sign a simple petition of support that Clooney and his agent, CAA’s Bryan Lourd, circulated to the top people in film, TV, records and other areas. Not a single person would sign. Here, Clooney discusses the petition and how it is just part of many frightening ramifications that we are all just coming to grips with.

DEADLINE: How could this have happened, that terrorists achieved their aim of cancelling a major studio film? We watched it unfold, but how many people realized that Sony legitimately was under attack?

 GEORGE CLOONEY: A good portion of the press abdicated its real duty. They played the fiddle while Rome burned. There was a real story going on. With just a little bit of work, you could have found out that it wasn’t just probably North Korea; it was North Korea. The Guardians of Peace is a phrase that Nixon used when he visited China. When asked why he was helping South Korea, he said it was because we are the Guardians of Peace. Here, we’re talking about an actual country deciding what content we’re going to have. This affects not just movies, this affects every part of business that we have. That’s the truth. What happens if a newsroom decides to go with a story, and a country or an individual or corporation decides they don’t like it? Forget the hacking part of it. You have someone threaten to blow up buildings, and all of a sudden everybody has to bow down. Sony didn’t pull the movie because they were scared; they pulled the movie because all the theaters said they were not going to run it. And they said they were not going to run it because they talked to their lawyers and those lawyers said if somebody dies in one of these, then you’re going to be responsible.We have a new paradigm, a new reality, and we’re going to have to come to real terms with it all the way down the line. This was a dumb comedy that was about to come out. With the First Amendment, you’re never protecting Jefferson; it’s usually protecting some guy who’s burning a flag or doing something stupid. This is a silly comedy, but the truth is, what it now says about us is a whole lot. We have a responsibility to stand up against this. That’s not just Sony, but all of us, including my good friends in the press who have the responsibility to be asking themselves: What was important? What was the important story to be covering here? The hacking is terrible because of the damage they did to all those people. Their medical records, that is a horrible thing, their Social Security numbers. Then, to turn around and threaten to blow people up and kill people, and just by that threat alone we change what we do for a living, that’s the actual definition of terrorism.

DEADLINE: I’ve been chasing the story of the petition you were circulating for a week now. Where is it, and how were these terrorists able to isolate Sony from the herd and make them so vulnerable?

 CLOONEY: Here’s the brilliant thing they did. You embarrass them first, so that no one gets on your side. After the Obama joke, no one was going to get on the side of Amy, and so suddenly, everyone ran for the hills. Look, I can’t make an excuse for that joke, it is what it is, a terrible mistake. Having said that, it was used as a weapon of fear, not only for everyone to disassociate themselves from Amy but also to feel the fear themselves. They know what they themselves have written in their emails, and they’re afraid.

DEADLINE: What happened when you sent the petition, and who did you ask to sign it?

CLOONEY: It was a large number of people. It was sent to basically the heads of every place. They told Bryan Lourd, “I can’t sign this.” What? How can you not sign this? I’m not going to name anyone, that’s not what I’m here to do, but nobody signed the letter, which I’ll read to you right now.
On November 24 of this year, Sony Pictures was notified that it was the victim of a cyber attack, the effects of which is the most chilling and devastating of any cyber attack in the history of our country. Personal information including Social Security numbers, email addresses, home addresses, phone numbers and the full texts of emails of tens of thousands of Sony employees was leaked online in an effort to scare and terrorize these workers. The hackers have made both demands and threats. The demand that Sony halt the release of its upcoming comedy The Interview, a satirical film about North Korean dictator Kim Jong Un. Their threats vary from personal—you better behave wisely—to threatening physical harm—not only you but your family is in danger. North Korea has not claimed credit for the attack but has praised the act, calling it a righteous deed and promising merciless measures if the film is released. Meanwhile the hackers insist in their statement that what they’ve done so far is only a small part of our further plan. This is not just an attack on Sony. It involves every studio, every network, every business and every individual in this country. That is why we fully support Sony’s decision not to submit to these hackers’ demands. We know that to give in to these criminals now will open the door for any group that would threaten freedom of expression, privacy and personal liberty. We hope these hackers are brought to justice but until they are, we will not stand in fear. We will stand together.
DEADLINE: That doesn’t sound like a hard paper to sign.

CLOONEY: All that it is basically saying is, we’re not going to give in to a ransom. As we watched one group be completely vilified, nobody stood up. Nobody took that stand. Now, I say this is a situation we are going to have to come to terms with, a new paradigm and a new way of handling our business. Because this could happen to an electric company, a car company, a newsroom. It could happen to anybody.

DEADLINE: You said you won’t name names, but how many people were asked and refused to sign? 

 CLOONEY: It was a fairly large number. Having put together telethons where you have to get all the networks on board to do the telethon at the same time, the truth is once you get one or two, then everybody gets on board. It is a natural progression. So here, you get the first couple of people to sign it and … well, nobody wanted to be the first to sign on. Now, this isn’t finger-pointing on that. This is just where we are right now, how scared this industry has been made. Quite honestly, this would happen in any industry. I don’t know what the answer is, but what happened here is part of a much larger deal. A huge deal. And people are still talking about dumb emails. Understand what is going on right now, because the world just changed on your watch, and you weren’t even paying attention.


DEADLINE: What kind of constraints will this put on storytellers that want to shine a critical light on a place like Russia, for instance, with something like a movie about the polonium poisoning of Alexander Litvinenko, the KGB officer who left and became an outspoken critic of Vladimir Putin?

 CLOONEY: What’s going to happen is, you’re going to have trouble finding distribution. In general, when you’re doing films like that, the ones that are critical, those aren’t going to be studio films anyway. Most of the movies that got us in trouble, we started out by raising the money independently. But to distribute, you’ve got to go to a studio, because they’re the ones that distribute movies. The truth is, you’re going to have a much harder time finding distribution now. And that’s a chilling effect. We should be in the position right now of going on offense with this. I just talked to Amy an hour ago. She wants to put that movie out. What do I do? My partner Grant Heslov and I had the conversation with her this morning. Bryan and I had the conversation with her last night. Stick it online. Do whatever you can to get this movie out. Not because everybody has to see the movie, but because I’m not going to be told we can’t see the movie. That’s the most important part. We cannot be told we can’t see something by Kim Jong-un, of all f*cking people.


DEADLINE: Some have pointed fingers at the media that feasted on these tawdry emails. Were they culpable in giving the terrorists a foothold, as Aaron Sorkin has said?

 CLOONEY: I do know something about the news world. I was sitting on the floors of newsrooms since I was seven years old, and I’ve been around them my whole life. I understand that someone looks at a story with famous people in it and you want to put it out. OK. It’s a drag, and it’s lame. But there’s not much you can do about it. You can’t legislate good taste. The problem is that what happened was, while all of that was going on, there was a huge news story that no one was really tracking. They were just enjoying all the salacious sh*t instead of saying, “Wait a minute, is this really North Korea? And if it is, are we really going to bow to that?” You could point fingers at Sony pulling the film, but they didn’t have any theaters, they all pulled out. By the way, the other studios were probably very happy because they had movies of their own going in for Christmas at the same cineplexes. There’s this constant circle, this feeding frenzy. What I’m concerned about is content. I’m concerned that content now is constantly going to be judged on a different level. And that’s a terrible thing to do. What we don’t need happening in any of our industries is censorship. The FBI guys said this could have happened to our government. That’s how good these guys were. It’s a serious moment in time that needs to be addressed seriously, as opposed to frivolously. That’s what is most important here.


DEADLINE: As Amy and Michael took their turn in the barrel because of these emails, some questioned why they’d approve a movie that ends with the death of a standing dictator in a hostile foreign country. Others have said she should be able to make any film she wants. It’s a satire. What do you think? 

CLOONEY:The South Park guys did it. They blew up his father’s head. The truth of the matter is, of course you should be able to make any movie you want. And, you should take the ramifications for it. Meaning, people can boycott the movie and not go see your film. They can say they’ll never see a Sony movie again. That’s all fine. That’s the risk you take for the decision you make. But to say we’re going to make you pull it. We’re going to censor you. That’s a whole other game. That is playing in some serious waters and it’s a very dangerous pool.


DEADLINE: You mentioned Team America. Some theaters wanted to show it on Christmas after The Interview was pulled as a show of defiance and Paramount pulled it back. They too are afraid of being in the hacker cross hairs.

CLOONEY: Everybody is looking at this from self interest and they are right in this sense. I’m a movie theater and I say, “OK, there’s been a threat. Not really a credible threat, but there’s a threat, and my lawyers call and tell me, “Well, you run the movie and you could be liable.” And all the other movies around it are going to have their business hurt. I understand that, and it makes complete sense. But that’s where we really need to figure what the real response should be. I don’t know what that is yet. We should be talking about that and not pointing fingers at people right now. Right now, it’s not just our community but a lot of communities. We need to figure out, what are we going to do now — when we know the cyberattacks are real, and they’re state-sponsored.

DEADLINE: Knowing what we do now, what does the government owe Sony?

CLOONEY: I’ve seen statements they’ve put out and what the president said and what the response is. The truth is, it’s all new territory and nobody knows how to handle it. I don’t think anyone was prepared for it. So now we’ll be prepared for it, hopefully. Everybody was doing their jobs, but somehow, we have allowed North Korea to dictate content, and that is just insane.

DEADLINE: You said everyone acts based on self interest. What’s yours?

CLOONEY: I wanted to have the conversation because I’m worried about content. Frankly, I’m at an age where I’m not doing action films or romantic comedies. The movies we make are the ones with challenging content, and I don’t want to see it all just be superhero movies. Nothing wrong with them, but it’s nice for people to have other films out there.


Subscribe to Deadline Breaking News Alerts and keep your inbox happy

The Soldier

$
0
0
 In his book Saina Chamorro poet and scholar Craig Santos Perez does something that really intrigued me. I recently wrote a review essay of his three poetry books hacha, Saina and Guma', and this was one thing that caught my eye. Throughout parts of the book he includes the names of soldiers from Micronesia, who will serving in the US military were killed in the Middle East, in the Horn of Africa, Afghanistan and Iraq. He lists them in the way that is customary for KIA lists, with their age and a hometown. He crosses out however everything except their names. 

The tactic of crossing things out can be a beautiful strategy. I used to use it alot before, most notably in my article "The (Un)exceptional Life of a Chamorro Soldier: Tracing the Militarization of Desire in Guam, USA. The act of crossing it out can mean that this doesn't really exist. It can be a way of de-emphasizing something. It can be a way of drawing attention to it, albeit in a circular way. Forcing people to deal with something to be removed in order to recall the structure in which it exists prior to the removal. It can be a minute act of defiance, against the regimes of text and discourse that surround. 

In my draft I wrote the following, that the crossing out of things was a reminder to focus on the individuals, to focus on them as people:

It is a reminder to not be caught up in the metrics by which islanders sometimes judge themselves, as being small and not really mattering. Guåhan and the other islands in Micronesia boast both the highest rates of enlistment and also the highest killed-in-action statistics per capita. We are encouraged not to remember these names and these people in the context of their military service but as our neighbors and friends. Perez’s critique exposes the cost of their participation and prompts us to understand that our island forced participation may be too high.

The recent documentary "Island of Warriors" and the general high levels of participation by Chamorro in the US military, always mean that patriotism and militarization are on my mind, sometimes in critical, sometimes in frustrating ways.When I think of the way that Chamorros articulate their own attachment to the United States through service, through patriotism, I cannot help but be confused. It is as if people imagine that putting on a uniform erases colonialism. It is as if people imagine that waving flags erases colonialism. It is as if people wish that what they feel and what they choose to believe and remember somehow affects colonialism. I am thinking about this today in particular because while doing research and prepping for one of my classes, I came across this poem by the English poet Rupert Brooke titled "The Soldier." It is filled with nationalistic fervor, justifying wars in foreign soil because the sacrifices make it so that the nation extends to whatever patch of earth its peoples' blood is spilled. This smacks of imperialism and the use of sacrifice and patriotism to justify it. This poem was written early on in Brooke's life as a soldier in World War I. He became very disillusioned later, eventually writing one of the most depressing anti-war poems ever, "Dulce Et Decorum Est." This poem mocks the previous incarnation of the patriotic solder of Brooke, spitting truth to the notion that it is sweet and beautiful to die for one's country, by recounting the scene of someone being consumed by mustard gas. 


**************

The Soldier 
by Rupert Brooke

IF I should die, think only this of me:
That there’s some corner of a foreign field
That is forever England. There shall be
In that rich earth a richer dust concealed;
A dust whom England bore, shaped, made aware,
Gave, once, her flowers to love, her ways to roam,
A body of England’s, breathing English air,
Washed by the rivers, blest by the suns of home.

And think, this heart, all evil shed away,
A pulse in the eternal mind, no less
Gives somewhere back the thoughts by England given;
Her sights and sounds; dreams happy as her day;
And laughter, learnt of friends; and gentleness,
In hearts at peace, under an English heaven.

Chago' i Korason-mu giya Guahu

$
0
0
-->
It is the one year anniversary of the passing of my grandmother, Elizabeth De Leon Flores Lujan. Family and friends held a gathering recently to remember her and celebrate her. As part of the gathering we sang some Christmas songs, both in English and Chamorro. It was a bit strange though because even though I spent several Christmases and in fact most Christmases in my grandparents' house in Mangilao, we never sang Christmas songs. We didn't do much decorations either. I've wondered if this is because grandma was already older and not as interested in those things, or because of her strong religious beliefs. Something that we would do for Christmas and at regular points through the year is sit around the dinner table and read bible lessons and bible verses. This is how I think grandma would probably want us to remember her and honor her, but reading the bible together. This past week I wrote about the new movie "Saving Christmas" and reflecting on the origins of Christmas and the deeper meanings associated or lost with it today. I went through the copy of the Chamorro Bible that I received from grandma in order to find some verses that would support my points. It was something that made me a little happy, but also very sad. I've included some of the ones that I came across below.

**************

Matthew 19:20 - 24

I patgon na taotao ilek-ña nu Guiya: Todu este siha hu adahi: Hafa trabiha fattå-ku?

Ilek-ña Si Jesus nu Guiya: Yanggen malago’ hao na un kabåles, hånao ya un bende todu i guinahå-mu, ya un nå’i i mamopble, ya u guaha guinahå-mu gi langhet: ya maila dalalak yu’.

Lao anai hu hungok i patgon na taotao este na sinangan, nina’triste ya ma’pos, sa’ guaha meggai iyo-ña na guinaha.

Ayu nai Si Jesus ilek-ña nu i disipulu-ña: Magåhet hu sangåni hamyo, na i manriku mappot humålom gi rainon langhet.

Ya hu sangåni hamyo ta’lo, na mas guse un kameyu maloffan gi matan haguha ki un riku u hålom gi rainan langhet.

Mark 7:8-9

Sa’ en pe’lo hamyo i tinago’ Yu’us, ya mantietiene fitme i tradision taotao siha (ni’ i mafa’gåsi i hara siha, yan i kopa siha, yan en få’tinas meggai na guinaha parehu yan este).  

Ya ilek-ña nu siha, magåhet hamyo yumute’ i tinago Yu’us para en adahi i tradision-miyu.

Matthew 15:8-9

Este na taotao siha, nu i labios-ñiha ha onra yu’, lao i korason-ñiha chågo’ giya Guahu.

Lao taisetbe i en adora yu’, manmama’na’na’gue i finana’guen-ñiha ni’ i sinangan taotao.

John 8:42

Ilek-ña Si Jesus nu siha: Yanggen Si Yu’us tatan-miyu, magåhet na en gefli’e’ yu’: sa’ Guahu humuyong yan måtto yu’ ginen as Yu’us. Ti humuyong yu’ ginen Guahu ha’, lao Guiya tumago’ yu’.

John 3:16

Sa’ taiguenao na ha guaiya Si Yu’us i tano’, ha nå’i ni’ linihis ha’ Lahi-ña i para todu ayu i humongge gui’, ti siña malingu, ya guaha lina’la’-ña taihinekok.

Sa’ ti ha tågo’ i Si Yu’us i lahi-ña guatu gi tano’ para u såpet i i tano’, lao para i tano’ u na’libre put Guiya.

I ti humongge gui’, ti u masåpet, ayu i ti humongge gui’ ayu u masåpet. Sa’ ti manhongge gi na’an i una ha’ na Lahin Yu’us.

Buenlos Dagu Christ and Buenlos Aga' New Year

Sorry, Freedom is Not Available in Your Country

$
0
0
After hearing for weeks about how the "terrorists" or North Koreans were winning the war against and for freedom, due to the decision of Sony not to distribute the film "The Interview," the company has decided to release the film on a limited basis. It can be streamed online and can be bought. Eventually it may be released through iTunes. It was interesting to see how a film which most people would probably not want to watch because of the abundance of jokes dealing with human genitalia, becomes an artifact over which freedom not on a national scale, but an international scale is fought. Screenings of The Interview have been filled with patriotic discourse and singing, in order to make that important argument that, this may be crap and it may be garbage, but I should have the right to eat crap and copulate with garbage if  I want to!

Speaking of freedom, people in Guam attempting to watch the Interview online soon found that they were prevented by most sites from doing so. The reason? The usual prohibition that Guam is foreign and therefore can't watch things meant for the US (or for countries that have negotiated agreements with the US or its companies). As I've often argued, this is the way that most people on Guam experience colonialism today, as this weird sort of exclusion. It is tied to a larger fundamental exclusion and disenfranchisement, but they connect it to problems with buying things online, being made fun of in movies, and these moments were suddenly when you live and who you are for some reason doesn't count when America is formed as a nation. It is something that you can call a mistake, something that can be "fixed," but when you think about it, that is the problem with such feelings of inclusion, they shouldn't require asterisks, exceptions or excuses.

Here are some articles about The Interview, because I haven't been able to watch it yet.
 
******************

Did North Korea Really Attack Sony?

It's too early to take the U.S. government at its word.

I am deeply skeptical of the FBI's announcement on Friday that North Korea was behind last month's Sony hack. The agency's evidence is tenuous, and I have a hard time believing it. But I also have trouble believing that the U.S. government would make the accusation this formally if officials didn't believe it.
Clues in the hackers' attack code seem to point in all directions at once. The FBI points to reused code from previous attacks associated with North Korea, as well as similarities in the networks used to launch the attacks. Korean language in the code also suggests a Korean origin, though not necessarily a North Korean one since North Koreans use a unique dialect. However you read it, this sort of evidence is circumstantial at best. It's easy to fake, and it's even easier to interpret it wrong. In general, it's a situation that rapidly devolves into storytelling, where analysts pick bits and pieces of the "evidence" to suit the narrative they already have worked out in their heads.
In reality, there are several possibilities to consider:
  • This is the work of independent North Korean nationals. Many politically motivated hacking incidents in the past have not been government-controlled. There's nothing special or sophisticated about this hack that would indicate a government operation. In fact, reusing old attack code is a sign of a more conventional hacker being behind this.
  • This is the work of hackers who had no idea that there was a North Korean connection to Sony until they read about it in the media. Sony, after all, is a company that hackers have loved to hate for a decade. The most compelling evidence for this scenario is that the explicit North Korean connection—threats about the movie The Interview—were only made by the hackers after the media picked up on the possible links between the film release and the cyberattack. There is still the very real possibility that the hackers are in it just for the lulz, and that this international geopolitical angle simply makes the whole thing funnier.
  • It could have been aninsider—Sony's Snowden—who orchestrated the breach. I doubt this theory, because an insider wouldn't need all the hacker tools that were used. I've also seen speculation that the culprit was a disgruntledex-employee. It's possible, but that employee or ex-employee would have also had to possess the requisite hacking skills, which seems unlikely.
  • The initial attack was not a North Korean government operation, but was co-opted by the government. There's no reason to believe that the hackers who initially stole the information from Sony are the same ones who threatened the company over the movie. Maybe there are several attackers working independently. Maybe the independent North Korean hackers turned their work over to the government when the job got too big to handle. Maybe the North Koreans hacked the hackers.
I'm sure there are other possibilities that I haven't thought of, and it wouldn't surprise me if what's really going on isn't even on my list. North Korea's offer to help with the investigation doesn't clear matters up at all.

Tellingly, the FBI's press release says that the bureau's conclusion is only based "in part" on these clues. This leaves open the possibility that the government has classified evidence that North Korea is behind the attack. The NSA has been trying to eavesdrop on North Korea's government communications since the Korean War, and it's reasonable to assume that its analysts are in pretty deep. The agency might have intelligence on the planning process for the hack. It might, say, have phone calls discussing the project, weekly PowerPoint status reports, or even Kim Jong Un's sign-off on the plan.

On the other hand, maybe not. I could have written the same thing about Iraq's weapons-of-mass-destruction program in the run-up to the 2003 invasion of that country, and we all know how wrong the government was about that.

Allan Friedman, a research scientist at George Washington University's Cyber Security Policy Research Institute, told me that from a diplomatic perspective, it's a smart strategy for the U.S. to be overconfident in assigning blame for the cyberattacks. Beyond the politics of this particular attack, the long-term U.S. interest is to discourage other nations from engaging in similar behavior. If the North Korean government continues denying its involvement no matter what the truth is, and the real attackers have gone underground, then the U.S. decision to claim omnipotent powers of attribution serves as a warning to others that they will get caught if they try something like this.

Sony also has a vested interest in the hack being the work of North Korea. The company is going to be on the receiving end of a dozen or more lawsuits—from employees, ex-employees, investors, partners, and so on. Harvard Law professor Jonathan Zittrain opined that having this attack characterized as an act of terrorism or war, or the work of a foreign power, might earn the company some degree of immunity from these lawsuits.

I worry that this case echoes the "we have evidence—trust us" story that the Bush administration told in the run-up to the Iraq invasion. Identifying the origin of a cyberattack is very difficult, and when it is possible the process of attributing responsibility can take months. While I am confident that there will be no U.S. military retribution because of this, I think the best response is to calm down and be skeptical of tidy explanations until more is known.
 
 
 
********************
 

Sony streams 'The Interview' online and makes Hollywood history

December 24, 2014: 4:19 PM ET
 
NEW YORK (CNNMoney)

A bit of Hollywood history unfolded on Wednesday. And it might be a glimpse into the future.

The controversial Sony Pictures comedy "The Interview" was released on YouTube, Google Play, the Microsoft Xbox video game console, and a special Web site.
 
The movie, which started streaming online around 1 p.m. ET, costs $5.99 to rent and $14.99 to buy.
So it is having historic simultaneous release in both living rooms and, come Christmas Day, about 300 independently-owned theaters across the United States.

Sony announced the digital release just an hour ahead of time, after CNNMoney and other news organizations began to report on the studio's plans to distribute "The Interview" through YouTube's movie rental store. Word spread via social media, and some curious fans started watching -- and live-tweeting -- the movie right at 1 p.m.

Sony's extraordinary announcement encapsulated days of sometimes desperate negotiations between the studio and a number of potential Internet distribution partners.

Related: You won't get hacked streaming 'The Interview' online
 
There was a plan at one point to allow rentals through Apple's iTunes store, but it fell apart, according to two sources with knowledge of the matter. An iTunes release could re-materialize sometime after Christmas.

Sony(SNE) could also cut a deal with a subscription streaming site like Netflix(NFLX, Tech30), enabling wider access to the movie sometime after Christmas.

But at the moment, it's up on YouTube and generating an enormous amount of free publicity for the embattled movie studio, which fell victim to a cyberattack late last month.

A Sony representative said the company would not be releasing any immediate data about the number of rentals or sales.


A groundbreaking moment for the American movie industry
 
The online release is groundbreaking -- but also awfully contentious. Owners of major theater chains have steadfastly opposed proposals for simultaneous physical and digital releases, a concept known in the industry as a same-day-and-date release.

It's been tried, with varying success, for some documentaries and niche dramas, but never for a big, broad comedy like "The Interview," which was originally meant to premiere on 2,000 to 3,000 screens.

But extraordinary circumstances call for extraordinary movie release strategies. This time last week, after hackers -- apparently objecting to the content of "The Interview" -- threatened American moviegoers, Sony canceled the movie's release.

Related: What we know now about the Sony Hack
 
Sony Pictures CEO Michael Lynton told CNN's Fareed Zakaria that he had no choice because "the movie theaters came to us, one by one, over the course of a very short period of time ... and announced that they would not carry the movie."

Some of the theater chains dispute that. But one thing is clear: that same day, December 17, Sony contacted Google(GOOGL, Tech30), Microsoft(MSFT, Tech30) and other potential online distributors.

"We never stopped pursuing as wide a release as possible for 'The Interview,'" Lynton said in a statement on Wednesday. "It was essential for our studio to release this movie, especially given the assault upon our business and our employees by those who wanted to stop free speech."

He added, "We chose the path of digital distribution first so as to reach as many people as possible on opening day, and we continue to seek other partners and platforms to further expand the release."
One of the platforms is a dedicated site, SeeTheInterview.com, done in partnership with Kernel and secure payments system Stripe. But that site appeared to be overwhelmed by traffic shortly after 1 p.m. ET. Kernel acknowledged "tremendous demand"but said the streams were "free flowing" by 2 p.m.

Google's streams appeared to be more stable.

Google senior vice president David Drummond wrote in a blog post that "security implications were very much at the front of our minds" when Sony contacted the company last week.

"After discussing all the issues, Sony and Google agreed that we could not sit on the sidelines and allow a handful of people to determine the limits of free speech in another country (however silly the content might be)," he wrote.


Next stop for 'The Interview:' indie theaters
 
As for the physical release on Thursday, the studio's list of participating theaters includes about 300 that will start showing it on Christmas and dozens of others that will start showing it on January 1 or January 2. Some of the Christmas Day screenings are already sold out.

"With what looks like a seriously limited release, limited supply is yielding substantial demand," the fan web site Moviepilot said.

For Sony's partners, the digital release of the movie is an opportunity to show off technological and commercial prowess.

YouTube, for instance, has a two-year-old movie rental system that many of its users don't know about; "The Interview" is chance to gain attention for it.

The movie, oddly enough, became a political and geopolitical symbol. It is about an assassination plot against the North Korean dictator Kim Jong-Un. And it is widely believed that Sony Pictures suffered a cyberattack last month partly due to North Korea's fury over the movie.

Backlash to Sony's original cancellation decision was fierce, including from President Obama, who said the movie studio had made a mistake.

Since then, Sony executives have stayed in close touch with White House officials, appraising them of the studio's efforts to seek distribution. And on Wednesday, administration officials signaled that they were pleased with the theatrical and digital plans.

Shortly after 1 p.m., the White House responded to reporters' inquiries with a statement: "The President welcomes the news that people will be able to decide for themselves whether or not to see this film, and appreciates Sony's work on this effort over the past few weeks."

The statement added, "With today's announcements, people can now make their own choices about the film, and that's how it should be."

Related: Dennis Rodman on 'The Interview': Watch my movie
 
Republican National Committee chair Reince Priebus concurred. In a followup to his Saturday message calling on theater owners to support the movie, he said the renewed Christmas release "was the right decision."

Priebus added, "Anything else would set a horrible precedent and allow our freedom to be ceded to the whims of a totalitarian regime."

--CNN's Pamela Brown and Michelle Kosinski contributed reporting


*********************

"The Interview, Painfully Bad"
David Edmund Moody
The Huffington Post
12/25/14


It's tempting to try to find something complimentary to say about The Interview. Surely any film that draws attention in any manner to the horrors of life in North Korea can't be all bad, right? Well, unfortunately, even such a film can indeed be all bad, and The Interview amply proves that point.
It's hard to know where to begin in cataloguing the painful parameters of this film, but perhaps its infantile fascination with all things anal would be one place to start. Rectal references occur on the order of once or twice every five minutes, sometimes supplemented with plot devices designed to focus attention on the anal orifice for sustained periods of time.

No movie of this caliber would be complete without copious gratuitous references to genitalia, and to various sex acts, replete with explicit visual depictions of barely-clothed erections, clearly intended for shock value only. Adolescent vulgarity of this variety is probably intended for a mentality on the order of freshmen in a backwater college fraternity, but any other viewer must either abdicate all standards of taste or else wonder why a movie of this kind is successful with a broader audience.
The question remains why a film that traffics in the ultimate in tastelessness and vulgarity tied its ugly tether to the dictatorship in North Korea. One would like to believe that such a connection was animated by some sensitivity to the realities of that regime, rather than callously exploiting those realities for narrow comedic purposes. The Interview, however, goes well out of its way to make sure that no loftier motives can be ascribed to it. North Korea, in this film, is nothing more than a foil for the purpose of introducing ever more lurid scatological and sexual material.

Having introduced the matter of North Korea, however, the film unfortunately does require some attention, if only to disabuse prospective viewers of any hope that it has any redeeming value. Notwithstanding the protections provided by the First Amendment, there is a valid question whether the assassination of any living head of state, no matter how heinous the individual or his regime, is suitable subject matter for a major studio motion picture. If one objects on moral grounds to any such depiction, it's hard to know where to direct one's concern. The Sony Corporation, not to mention the stars and originators of this film, are surely impervious to any objections raised from any quarter, even if Sony withheld release of the film for a few days in order to placate Kim Jung Un himself.
Finally, one can only wonder if there is any limit to the coarsening of culture and public discourse. Seth Rogen and his ilk exhibit a genius in this direction, and no doubt are at work even now to find some way of exceeding their accomplishments of this kind. If our commercial forms of entertainment lavishly reward such endeavors, The Interview represents a mirror in which we can, perhaps, see ourselves. But if, like the winter solstice on which it was released, this film represents the darkest night of our culture, we can at least take solace in the thought that only brighter days must lie ahead.


 *******************

 "Audiences 'Let Freedom Ring' at The Interview premiere in New York City.
Stephanie Marcus
Huffington Post
12/25/14

"The Interview" probably should have been called "The Honey Pot."

It's a term and idea frequently referenced in the Seth Rogen and Evan Goldberg co-directed film, in which Rogen's character explains, "It's an attractive spy woman who lures men into doing shit they're not supposed to do."

At the 10 a.m. Christmas Day screening of "The Interview" at Cinema Village -- the only theater currently showing the film in Manhattan -- it was hard not to feel like audiences had been honey-potted in some respect. In this case, they were lured into showing up with notions of protecting free speech and and the sexiness of sticking it to the hackers who, last week, dared to evoke the memory of the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks in their threats.

The idea that seeing "The Interview" in theaters was important or even patriotic was only amplified by the scene in and around Cinema Village. Many media members (myself included) pounced on moviegoers as they purchased tickets. Inside, theater manager Lee Peterson introduced the comedy by quoting "My Country, 'Tis of Thee."

"Let freedom ring," Peterson said to the crowd of around 100 people. "No one can tell us what we can or can't see. So enjoy the film."

It's a seductive narrative, mostly because people don't like being told they can't see something --especially by hackers that may or may not be working for a brutal dictatorship in North Korea. It's likely one of the reasons that all of Cinema Village's afternoon screenings are sold out -- even after Sony made the film available to stream online for half the price of a theater ticket.

It's all this buzz surrounding the movie, and Sony's flip flop on releasing the film, that was what brought Jacqueline and Anthony Goodling to the movie theater.

"I wanted to come down here and see all the hype around something," said Anthony Goodling. "But, in reality, it's a movie, and for everyone to blow it out of proportion like they did, I just think it's going to be really good and really funny."

Jacqueline, his wife, added that they didn't have any plans to see "The Interview" before Sony pulled it from theaters last week, but decided to after it became an issue of free speech.

Other theatergoers, such as Karen Shea and her husband, planned to see the film all along, but admitted they came out today due to "curiosity" and due to the "novelty" of Sony briefly pulling it from theaters.

The movie itself is everything you'd expect from a movie starring Seth Rogen and James Franco --dick jokes, fart jokes, celebrity cameos and even the delightful integration of language from the Internet's favorite Deranged Sorority Girl Email. It's not exactly ground-breaking stuff, but audiences are at least now able to make the choice to see those dick and fart jokes for themselves.

"We live in an area where we have freedom of speech, and can see anything as far as movies and media," Jacqueline Goodling said. "And this was shut down for a period of time, just because of the hacking and because of the fear that we had. That's not what we're about."

Letter from Joseph E. Rivera

$
0
0
Ti katoliko yu', gof ti katoliko yu'. Lao hu komprende na hagas gof tahdong i hinenggen katoliko gi kutturan Chamoru. Put este, ti hu despresia i Chamorro siha ni' manmanhohongge gi i gima'yu'us katoliko. Para meggai na Chamorro siha, yan-niha i gima'yu'us katoliko ti put i pinayon-niha ha', lao yan-niha sa' ti gof mappot luma'la katoliko giya Guahan. Guaha meggai na areklamento gi i gima'yu'us, lao ti manstriku. Guaha misa, gupot yan dinana' siha, ya este i Chamorro ma gof gogosa. Achokka' mumosmisa hao un biahi kada sakkan, katotoliko ha'. Ya gaigaige ha' i kustumbre siha achokka' tataigue ha' hao gi i gima'yu'us.

I halacha' na yinaoyao gi gima'yu'us put i tinilaika siha desde un nuebu na gurupu umannok gi halom i gima'yu'us. Ti hu gof komprende i chi-na siha este na mimu. Lao hu tungo' na meggai manlinayo' put i bidada-na i Maga'obispo. Ti ha fa'taotaotao hun i taotao gi halom i gima'yu'us, ya ha fa'sasanghe' hun ayu i ti ya-na este na nuebu na gurupu yan i kustumbren-niha. Ti hu tungo' kao magahet este na inakusa siha, lao hu tungo' na magahet i pinitin i taotao. Hu tungo' na i dos na pale' ni' mafa'takpapa' gof maguaiya gi kumunidat.

Hu sodda' este na kata gi i blog JungleWatch. I pine'lo siha gi este na blog, ma sen aguiguiyi unu na banda gi yinaoyao, lao meggai na infotmasion sinembatgo.


***********************

December 17, 2014

Dear Archbishop Apuron,

These are undoubtedly trying times for the Catholic Church here in our island.  I am writing to you because I continue to be saddened by the problems facing our beloved Church in Guam.  It is undeniable that our Archdiocese is clearly divided, and that many of our people are angry, distraught, and confused by all the discord within our Church and among our leaders.  The people of the Archdiocese – and even the many in our island community who are not Catholic but who are nonetheless concerned for our island – are all looking to you to provide resolution, healing, and closure. Unfortunately, rather than bringing about resolution, healing, and closure, it is clear that information released by the Chancery has only served to further inflame the situation rather than quell it.
With that said, I pray that you take what I am about to say positively, for my sole intention is to offer my thoughts in an effort to foster understanding, reconciliation, and ultimately the restoration of peace and unity within our fractured Church.  I understand that there are numerous issues that need to be addressed, but I wanted to specifically focus on the one area that I believe can be immediately improved: the area of finances.

On this subject, I believe I am more than qualified to speak, as it has been my profession for well over 35 years.  As you know, for the last thirteen years, I have been entrusted as the Chief Financial Officer of Calvo Enterprises, the largest locally owned company in Guam.  Prior to that, I worked in the public sector as Director of the Bureau of Budget Management and Research for the Government of Guam, serving as the Chief Financial Advisor for three governors of Guam.  In all of my previous positions, I have enjoyed the complete trust of my employers, who knew that I would always give my best professional advice.
Archbishop, I believe you asked me to be a member of the Archdiocesan Finance Council for this very reason.  It was an office I served faithfully for eight years.  I always felt that you trusted that my advice was based on what I believed to be in the best interest of our Church. If I were still serving in this capacity, I would have advised you and the Archdiocese to be extremely careful about appropriately dealing with financial matters.  I assure you that I mean this with no condescension, but finances can be very complicated and difficult to understand, and when someone other than trained professionals are allowed to make financial interpretations and pronouncements without proper guidance, errors are bound to be made.  Unfortunately, some of these errors can cause great harm to individuals, especially if a rush to judgment is made without properly uncovering and understanding all the pertinent facts.  This is precisely what I believe has happened to Msgr. James Benavente and all the good people who worked alongside him at the Cathedral-Basilica and the Catholic Cemeteries.
As an example, many negative things have been said about the loans made for the unquestionably beautiful renovation of the Cathedral-Basilica overseen by Msgr. James, implying that the Archdiocese is left saddled with a huge and unreasonable debt.  But once again, this is just the opposite of what the facts clearly reflect.  
It is an irrefutable fact that even before securing financing for the Cathedral-Basilica renovation project, Msgr. James did his homework and first sought out and secured as much alternative funding for the project as he could.  He knew that the cost was going to be enormous – in excess of $6.8 million – and he knew that he had to reduce that burden to the greatest extent possible.  He was creative and resourceful, and in the end, more successful that we could have ever imagined.  Msgr. James secured over $3.555 million in cash contributions, which funded an astounding 52% of the project.
Here are the facts extracted from past correspondence of the Archdiocesan Finance Officer to the Cathedral Basilica Parish Council:
  • The total cost of the renovation was in excess of $6.8 million;
  • Msgr. James secured Federal Funding for the project, totaling $2.14 million;
  • Msgr. James secured Public Donations totaling $1.27 million;
  • Msgr. James secured Contractor/Supplier Donations totaling $145,000.00
  •    Msgr. James had the Basilica Approved as a Federal Historic Preservation Site, which entitled it to certain grants and funding;
  • Through consolidation with other loans, the interest rate was reduced to 4.125%;
  • Project balance as of  June 30, 2014 was only $1.73 million

Basilica Renovations

Original Cost
           6,805,500.00
100.00%
Government Grants
           2,140,200.00

Contributions & Donations - General
1,270,000.00

Contributions & Donations - Contractors & Suppliers
                               145,300.00


3,555,500.00
52.24%



Current Rate
    4.125%

Original Loan
3,250,000.00

Principal Paid through 06/30/2014
           1,518,920.31
22.32%



Principal Balance 06/30/2014
1,731,079.69
25.44%

As your Finance Officer, Mr. Dominic Kim, has indicated in his correspondence, the loan balance for this particular project is down from $6.8 million to $1.7 million. This was possible only because Msgr. James was able to fund so much of the project through his tireless efforts at securing donations and alternate funding sources.  Had this not been the case, the loan balance would have been much, much larger, and the monthly debt service requirement that much greater.  For illustration purposes, a $6.8 million loan amortized for thirty years at an interest rate of 4.125% would still have had a balance of over $4.2 million, as compared to the actual balance of $1.7 million as stated above.
Msgr. James has proven time and time again that the people respond to his call when he appeals to them for help in funding a particular need of the Church.  In addition to what I have mentioned above, I am also aware of several other large donations secured by Msgr. James.  For one, the Chapel of St. Therese and the Museum at the Cathedral-Basilica were built entirely through a donation secured by Msgr. James from two prominent local families.  Each donor contributed $1 million to the Cathedral-Basilica for the Chapel of St. Therese and the Museum.  I know of no other person, religious or otherwise, who has been able to successfully obtain in excess of $6 million in donations and contributions for the Archdiocese in such a short period of time – and all for the benefit of, and love for, our Church and her people.
Archbishop, there is a basic business principle that “you have to spend money to make money.”  Some of the information released from the Chancery, both verbal and written, have accused Msgr. James of being too excessive in his expenditures while he was in charge of the Cathedral-Basilica and the Catholic Cemeteries.  My response to this, as a finance professional and a devout Catholic of our island, is twofold.  First, in order to be completely fair and transparent about this issue, and before any conclusions are drawn, Msgr. James is owed an opportunity to address and respond to any findings before they are publicly released.  Second, I urge you to look at all the pertinent facts, in their entirety, and take into consideration the millions of dollars that Msgr. James has been able to secure on behalf of the Archdiocese during this same period.  This brings to mind an old business caveat:  We must constantly guard against being “pennywise and pound foolish.”  Msgr. James spent a few thousand dollars and, as a result, successfully brought in several million dollars.  That is an awesome return on the investment by any standard.  
The point I am trying to make is this:  It is critical to interpret all the information correctly before any actions are considered.  Prior to the release of any financial information, great care is required to ensure that the information is factual, accurate, and documented, and that the decisions made and conclusions reached are reasoned, sound, and supported by the information.  This has not been happening with the reports that have come out from the Archdiocese thus far.  It is for this reason that I am once again coming forward to express my concerns regarding the misinformation that has been released by your financial advisors.  In particular, I believe that the release of financial allegations regarding the Cathedral-Basilica and the Catholic Cemeteries was, at best, poorly handled.  I pray that you fully consider the great harm that this misinformation continues to inflict – not just upon Msgr. James and all those who worked closely with him at both of these entities, but upon our beloved Church and the thousands of faithful who are confused, disillusioned, and in many cases, outraged, by the Chancery’s handling of this matter.  
This “mishandling” of the situation has been demonstrated many times over.  As one example, the memos released by the Archdiocese contained information on items that had already been resolved, yet the memos were written as though the problems persist.  Even worse was the inclusion of a false statement about securing Archdiocesan property as collateral for the Catholic Cemeteries loan.  This same position was also incorrectly interpreted by the Archdiocesan Finance Officer, Mr. Dominic Kim, well over two years ago in 2012, and was previously corrected back then as well.  Despite knowing the truth, you and your advisors continue to erroneously cite this as a major offense committed by Msgr. James.  These items taken together painted a distorted and inaccurate financial picture that disregarded all the documented and monumental progress that had already been accomplished.
When Msgr. James was first removed, your memos and public releases selectively picked little snippets of information from the auditor’s report and paraphrased them out of context, so that only the problems were publicized while the fact that they were already resolved was conveniently omitted.  Is this not the same as lying? Most people reading the auditor’s report will quickly recognize that the document was intended as a sort of progress report that lists some of the issues that were found, addresses how these issues were remedied, and also recommends how to further improve the financial operations.  
These unsubstantiated accusations are a direct attack on the many, many individuals who had been working diligently to shore up the financial footing of both the Cathedral-Basilica and the Catholic Cemeteries.  These people worked hard because they all wanted to help.  No one was seeking to be publicly acknowledged or thanked, but when those releases from the Chancery were published, you and your advisors effectively and unfairly called into question the integrity of all these individuals. To this day, no one has ever been given an opportunity to respond to the allegations.
I cannot express more strenuously and emphatically that whenever one deals with financial reviews of an entity, it is critically important to conduct an interview process. The interviews are conducted to allow the entity under review an opportunity to clarify the auditor’s understanding of the facts and circumstances surrounding the findings and to correct any misunderstandings and inaccuracies.  The process of obtaining the input and comments of the entity is a crucial step to ensuring the accuracy and objectivity of the audit.  Unfortunately, in this situation, this step was skipped.  It is my understanding that additional information and allegations have continued to be released selectively, once again without allowing the appropriate individuals an opportunity to respond.  I hope and pray that this is not true, because not only is this dishonest, but it also goes contrary to the gospel that you as Archbishop have been ordained to uphold.  I hesitate to use this word, but it somehow feels appropriate in this circumstance:  Archbishop, this feels evil.
On a separate note, I want to state that I have had to bury two dear family members this past year, so I have had direct and first-hand experience dealing with both the previous Catholic Cemeteries personnel under Msgr. James and the current Cemeteries staff and personnel.  We buried my mom in January of this year, and the staff and management of the Catholic Cemeteries treated us with complete dignity, compassion, and care.  They performed their duties with the utmost professionalism.  My brother passed away this past September, and we thus had an opportunity to work with the new Catholic Cemeteries staff and management for his burial.  While I acknowledge that the current staff is trying, I must express that the work and the services they are performing falls dramatically short of the standards established by their predecessors under Msgr. James.  I have a lot to say in this area, including how my family and I were treated.  But for now, I will summarize my recent experiences by saying that there is an obvious and striking decline in the level of service that is currently being provided at the Catholic Cemeteries.  
In closing, I want to thank you for taking the time to read my lengthy letter, and I trust that you will appreciate that its length is a direct indication of how much consternation these recent events have caused me, and how troubled I am about the fate of our island Church.  Allow me to conclude by reiterating that the manner with which Msgr. James Benavente, his staff, and financial advisors were treated goes contrary how Jesus instructs us to treat one another: “If your brother sins against you, go and tell him his fault between you and him alone. If he listens to you, you have won over your brother.  If he does not listen, take one or two others along with you, so that ‘every fact may be established on the testimony of two or three witnesses.’”  Archbishop, please correct me if I am wrong, but from a layman’s point of view, I expected you to practice as well as preach Matthew’s gospel. Instead, with the public releases from your office, it appears that you did the complete opposite of the gospel mandate.  
I am very troubled and confused that you falsely reported undocumented mismanagement of the Cathedral-Basilica and Catholic Cemeteries to various Archdiocesan bodies, and then – and only then– did you call Msgr. James into your office to discuss these issues with him.  You never gave him the opportunity to defend himself, his reputation, or the people who worked with him all these years.  Archbishop, all those people who worked with Msgr. James were working as much for you as for him.  They, and Msgr. James, were all your soldiers in Christ, and they were loyal to you.  They are all good, intelligent people who believed that they were doing something valuable and worthwhile for our Church. Those infamous releases alleging financial mismanagement turned out to be a shocking and painful awakening to all, and unfortunately, a call to action by many.  Please, Archbishop, this has to stop now.  
As you may be inclined to agree, I know of nothing good that can come out of impugning a person’s good name.  Archbishop, I am pleading with you to begin the healing, and I pray that you can restore the close relationship you once enjoyed with Msgr. James.  In the spirit of the Advent Season now upon us – as we prepare to receive the Baby Jesus, the Prince of Peace – I pray that you will be for your people the agent of peace and goodwill that our island faithful desperately need.


Joseph E. Rivera

Do Not Go Quietly into That Silent Dead Language Night

$
0
0
It has dawned on me more than ever before, the dire straits in which the Chamorro language exists in today. The death of my grandmother last year started forcing me to recognize this fact. I speak Chamorro on a daily basis, but one of the people I enjoyed speaking it with the most was now gone. The one who instilled in me a passion for the language is now gone. I worked on so many projects regarding the language with her at my side. Ti sina hu eksplika i minalingu hu siesiente pa'go put i tinague-na.

When I look to my students, my family, my friends, there is just no one who can take the place of my grandmother in terms of speaking Chamorro. It is also something that has hurt my children and their ability to speak Chamorro. When we would visit grandma and grandpa before, grandma was always very diligent about speaking Chamorro to them, even if sometimes I would have to remind her to do it. Grandpa however, likes to through in a Chamorro word here or there, but has never gotten comfortable speaking to them in Chamorro. He'll say silly things like, "Sumahi do you know what lamasa means?" (answer: table) and she'll look at me with her atan guana and ask me with her eyes, "is he serious?" I'll atan sigi her back, and then she'll smile awkwardly at grandma and say "hunggan, table." 

I have long committed to ensuring that I help as many people as possible learn the Chamorro language. Whether this means offering free classes, helping people find resources, or helping to organize programs such as the Master Apprentice Language Revitalization project that Ken Kuper and Ed Alvarez are working on. Languages are alive because people use them and they survive because people teach them. This is the simple calculus of it all. But lately I have been feeling, actively, constantly, consciously, that there is just less and less Chamorro out there in the world. After all, we went from having 35,000 speakers in the Marianas, to only having 25,000 today according to the last two US Census results. As a result I have been collecting as much written in the Chamorro language as possible. I have extensive archives already that I've put together over the years, but now more than ever I have even started to collect things from the internet and borrow things to scan or photocopy. 

In the media in Guam, I have written about many times before, the Chamorro language is so absent it is almost offensive. Other than a single Chamorro music station and the mixed Chamorro talk radio on another station, you barely hear it on the airwaves. In the newspapers, you have a Chamorro crossword puzzle each Tuesday in the Marianas Variety, and the Chamorro column and Juan Malimanga in the upper right corner of the PDN 6 days a week. You also have published on an infrequent basis Peter Onedera's puru ha' gi fino' CHamoru na tinige' gi i PDN. In magazines you basically have nothing except for a small amount of Chamorro content featured in the Super Shopper provided by Learn Chamorro.com. 

I am glad that in the media in the CNMI, you still find Chamorro used for letters to the editor and for columns. It is clearly not the primary means of communication or even dominant in any general way, but at least there, you find writers or speakers who refuse to let the language go quietly into that silent dead language night. Here is one article I was copying and pasting earlier today during my collecting.

***************

Gradiosu na Konbetsasion
|
Posted onNov 27 2014
Dispues de sena matachoñg i dos amku` gi baranda. Sige masañgan grasian finapos famaguon niha. Ni unu gaige sa` todu man-hanau dispues de man-mapega gi sagan niha.

Ha mensiona i tata haye magahet i kalagtos gi halom i tropa, kontodu i ti gef mana`e ni mabendise motmut respetu yan hinimidde. Estague` na patgon i satton gi mañainaña.

I tres ni mas mañgalagtos kada unu gai heñiu. Unu tomtum, i otru suenu mientras i uttimu respondot. I pumalu mañgontentu ya ti man-mefnu` lau man-humidde yan osgun gi tinagu` mañainan niha. Dinanche na meskla gi dinaña familia sa` kada unu ha fatta hafa moduña.

I eskaleran konbetsasion oppan respetu gi entalu` mañelu. I temtum man-atan ya ha pesa i man-sañgan gi lamasa. Ha templa dispues para u guaha grasia yan chaleg. Dispues ha chule` ukulele ya ha tutuhon kumanta. Manatte todu estake sumen bonito i sunidu matemplaña. Na`magof piot gi tiempon ha`anen gupot siha.

Dispues de man-hanau i famaguon tatte giya siha gi la pupueñge sige ta`lu i dos amku` kumonbetsasion. Nina`e i biha un` dañkulu na agradesimiento ni bihu pot satton yan fiet tumohge kumu katsoña parehu ha` gi halom katma yan pagyu. “Hagu mas pot tai yinayas hau asaguahu”.
Mattu i dos gi nina` siñan kada patgon.

“Mauleg si Piñg na guahu ha tatiye kalagtos”, ilegña i bihu. Ha totche, “Sa` kumu hagu kasse labanderu i patgon”.

Sinablasus: “Hmmm! Kumu ha` fatsu guahu ha tatiye lau atan haye i man-satton”. Sige ta`lu i dos chumaleg, era kulan uma`akasen ñaihon grasiosamiente.

Ayu na mañelu siempre i amku` u tachu gi hilu` inatuñgu` yan pumalu gi asuntun familia siha. Ni achog haf` masusede, hihot relasion niha `nai sumen fitme pegse` inapinitiye gi halom siha. Hu tuñgu este na familia deste pinatgon-hu. Felis todu hinanau kada unu.

Sunidon Noche Buena 

Deste otru semana gi 27 de Nobiembre ta tulus hit dumandan sunidon Noche Buena gi ha`anen Thanksgiving. Estague` na dia tutuhon i ha`anen gupot siha.

Hu tuñgu` na guaha na lamasan sena ti u kabales na biahe pot guaha man-madispone guine gi alacha. Lau, muñga nina` fan chatsaga. Petsige dinaña miyu ni man-gaige pa`gu piot ya guaha siha famaguon miyu. Fanu`e siha haf` sustansian dinaña familia.

Gi todo finatton este na tiempu, gaige gi taduñg fondun talañgahu i atban gima Yuus ni sessu hu huñgog antes gi suenon pueñge. Oran preparasion para Misan Gayu.

Dispues de misa, dinaña amotsa antes de deskanson para `an mattu i Niño Jesus gi la talo`ane. Megai mamopble guihe na tiempu lau motmut minagof gi entalu` todus. Un` ma`gas na ha`ane `nai todu mañaunau man-managam gi finatton i Niño.

Pinadesen Ñalañg

Kada hu li`e annunsiu pot kontribusion para i man-namase` pa`gu na Christmas, sige hinasoghu umafulu` yan un` kuestion: Magahet na guaha man-ñañalañg guine gi tano`ta?

Yangin magahet pues mauleg ta rikonose pot para ta ketuñgu` hafa na masusesede este gi mismu familia-ta. Kau gaige dos saina gi gima`? Kau mantai che`chu`? Kau siña ta suda`e offisiun niha?
Makat este hu aksepta pot kinahulo`hu mismu halom un` sumen popble na guma`. Ayu mina` asianu-yu` kumetuñgu hafa fondun este na chinatsaga yangin enfin masusesede guine.

Para hafa tafan apune na i areglon familia gaige gi halom guma`. Mañgge i dos saina yan kau hafa siña tachogue para ta bira tatte giya siha dignu na modun lina`la`. Mas presisu ayudu piot `nai guaha gi entalu` dos saina inutet `sino sumen malañgu. Estague` `nai humahalom sensian mauleg na Kilisyanu. Nafan geftau hamyu gi man-namase`!

Ekonomian Antes

Sessu hu huñgog mañaina-ta masañgan pot abundansia guinahan tanu` gi tiempon Japones ginen fangualu`an yan tasi. Kontodu punot yan fina` hayu man-mabebende guihe na tiempu.

Dañkulu na metkau guaha, era i dañkulu na numeron tautau giya Japon ni debi u fan maprebeniye mantension. Ayu mina` fahna maseha hafa na produktu piot ayu siha i usun Japones tat kumu todu klasen produktun guihan, asukat, asientun mendioka yan gapgap, kamute, kalamasa, lañan niyog, yan otru siha produktun tanu`.

Pa`gu na biahe mampos malimitte metkau gi halom hita mismu. Gigon un` planta produktomu ya ti mafahan, katga dispues ya un` preparaye i babue. Mampos dañkulu na maliñgu gi lancheru siha.
Lau siña ta ta`lun bumisita este na asuntu gi inestablese homlu` na relasion yan Japon. Ha sedi hit Seksiona 902 gi papa` i Covenant na u esgaihon hit i US Department of State gi bandan assistimientu pot ekonomia. Guaha mohon gai diniseha umatan este na asuntu? Dañkulu na benefisiu para hita.

•••

I amiguhu Magoo mampos inestotba ni siniseden kuattru na lancheru yan otru kuattru na famalao`an ni man-mapunu` `sino maliñgu. Kau man-mapunu` pot salape? Mana` fan malag manu i kuattru na famalao`an? Haf` uttimoña inbestigasion mapunu` dos umasagua giya San Vicente?

Guaha lokue` mansañgan na pot ti tautau-ta na kulan machoneg gi un` banda i inbestigasion. Ileghu na lache este na kuentos. Makat na cho`chu` i para un` tatiye che`chu` seriousu na kriminat. Sabe dios minalagu` DPS sumatba este pot para u guaha pas yan inañgoghu na man-safu i tautau gi señgsoñg siha.

Mauleg u guaha mas inatuñgu` polisia yan membron kada soñgsoñg pot para u guaha añgoghuyon na relasion gi para umana` safu ha`anen todus. Konfiansa sumen presisu gi este na relasion.

•••

Gi kanton shoko (warehouse) madulog ni boys i alamle ya mabatsala huyuñg dose kes setbesa. Mana` maneñgheñg ya sige man-gimen. Dispues de `las dose todu man-bulachu. Mattu i polisia `nai ha soda` na masake i setbesa gi ge`halom. Lastima i pueñgen noche buena! Man-magmata dispues gi halom presu sige man-afaisen haf` taimanu fattun niha guatu. Ai na Silent Night.

Adios 2014!

$
0
0


Dandan i pandaretas! Na'fanpalangpang!

Dialogues Before the Skull

$
0
0

Weekly Address by Speaker Judith T. Won Pat
Guam Legislature
December 31, 2014

"Reconnecting with History to Better Understand Our Lives Today"
Buenas yan Hafa Adai!

Last night, a special mass was held at the Cathedral Basilica in which parishioners were
able to view the skull of 17th century Jesuit missionary Father Manuel de Solorzano. As
we close the year, this occasion reminds us of the importance of looking at our history to better understand the complexities we face today.

Father Solarzano was killed on Guam in 1684 during a battle waged by Maga’låhi Hura,
who was motivated by the desire to protect our ancestors’ way of life and their connection to the land. This was one of the last major battles of the Chamorro-Spanish Wars, and the closest our chiefs got to reclaiming Hagåtña from the Spanish. However, Hula’s forces were defeated by a group of Chamorros, who had converted to Catholicism and were fighting to protect the Church.

This return of Solorzano’s remains 330 years later has generated a range of feelings and reflections vis-à-vis constructs of history and identity. It has also drawn attention to traditions of Chamorro warfare, resistance to the Spanish Crown, as well as divisions and battles between our own people, which have no doubt lasted throughout our history.

We tend to think of World War II as the largest war in Chamorro history. While it is no doubt a period closely tied to the memory of our people that resulted in tragedy and the taking of our lands, it also important to acknowledge the 17th Century Chamorro rebellion, which is indicative of how our people were willing to fight and die for our culture and our lands. These wars lasted for 27 years, and most of us know nothing about this time.

As we embark on a new year alongside this particular occasion (the arrival of Solorzano’s remains) let us take this time to reconnect with a history that is our own, and deeply and conscientiously reflect on the actions of our ancestors, as well as in response to those who came to our island with glorified intentions of spreading their mission. Let’s consider the ways in which colonial history and the accessibility of this history have defined our present state and sense of culture.

As we look on the horizon of our rapidly changing island and work to redefine the future of our island, let us thoughtfully determine what we want as a people. Let’s understand our rich, complicated, and telling history and, most notably, make it our own. A Round Table Discussion entitled Chamorro Catholicism, Sovereignty, and Evangelization will take place Friday, January 2nd, from 6:30 to 8:30 p.m. at the Cathedral Basilica Conference Room, in which the public is invited.

The public is also invited to a scholarly dialogue hosed by the University of Guam on Saturday, January 3rd at 11 a.m. at The College of Liberal Arts and Social Sciences Lecture Hall, which will include a display of Father Solorzano’s remains. I would like to encourage the community to attend these events and learn more about this important history.

Saina Ma’ase

I Ilun Pale'

$
0
0

"I Ilun Pale'"
Michael Lujan Bevacqua
Marianas Variety
12/3114

This week, a very intriguing, almost ironic historical twist will be visiting Guam, with the arrival of the skull of Påle’ Manuel Solorzano, a Jesuit priest who was killed by Chamorros in 1684 during the period when some Chamorros were still resisting the Catholic intrusion into their lives.

I say ironic for many reasons, but chiefly among them is the fact that the preserving of this skull represents the precise thing that the Spanish priests were so keen on eradicating. The Chamorro religion of this time was centered around ancestral worship, or the revering of the spirits of your relatives who had passed away. By revering them Chamorros believed that these spirits, these aniti or manganiti could help Chamorros by protecting them and help them in their day to day activities such as making it rain for crops, helping catch fish, or being brave in battle. For Chamorros, their spiritual anchors to their manganiti were bones. From men who had passed on, the bones of their legs would be carved into spear tips, so that when a warrior went into battle, he didn’t fight alone, but with the spirit of a hopefully brave deceased relative at his side, in his very hands. The main bone which was kept by Chamorros was the skull. It would be kept in the home and treated with great respect, sometimes Chamorros would talk directly to the skulls, never raising their voice. They would ask for their counsel, their protection and even offer them food at meals.

As part of forcing Chamorros to accept a new religion, new way of life and new regime, the Spanish forces targeted these skulls among other things. By crushing them they and hoped to weaken the morale of Chamorros resisting Spanish rule and also hoped to turn them away from what the colonizers felt was devil worship. As the Spanish were scattering and destroying the sacred relics of Chamorros, they were keeping skulls of their own. Påle’ Manuel Solorzano was killed during the uprising of Hula (who is sometimes referred to as Yura, Yula or Yoda). This was the last large battle of the Chamorro Spanish Wars in Guam. It took place long after the Spanish had thought Guam to be pacified and considered the only real resistance to their rule to exist in the islands north of Guam. Hula and his fellow rebel Chamorros attacked the Spanish presence in Hagatna hoping to take advantage of the fact that most of their forces were off-island. Here is a passage of the speech attributed to Hula:

“The ones who are healthy or strong are not here in this land, and those who remained in Hagåtña are the cruel, the disabled and sick. It is not difficult to attack and eradicate them. If we do not make use of ourselves now, we cannot triumph over them tonight and they will crush us in an unfavorable place, and we can no longer live our own way of life, because if they succeed to control the other islands to the north, our hopes are gone. Where else are we to flee? Follow me and be praised forever, because we will be able to enjoy our land.”

Hula’s attack was an initial success, but did not lead to the expulsion of the Spanish that he had hoped for. Påle’ Solorzano was killed during this period, after being stabbed in the head several times as well as the throat. His skull (with the marks of the attack that killed him very apparent) was preserved however and sent to the Philippines and later to his family in Spain. In the Catholic Church there is a common practice for keeping artifacts and relics such as this. It is intriguing that as they were condemning Chamorros for keeping skulls, there was no thought to the irony of keeping the skulls of their own fallen missionaries. After Chamorros stopped fighting and began to accept the new religion and life forced upon them, a slow realization took place. Many of the beliefs that Chamorros held, bore a similar structure to things the colonizers were compelling them to live by.

After the 1671 insurrection by Maga’låhi Hurao and his allies failed, a priest reported that Chamorros were appearing to willingly converting because they had seen the failure of their ancestral spirits and the success of the spirits that protected the priests and soldiers. Chamorros saw that there were similarities, between their manganiti that they talked to and asked assistance from and celebrated, and the saints that the priests were always talking to, celebrating and asking assistance from. Although at first you can argue most Chamorro did not agree with the Catholic and Spanish intrusions into their lives, they eventually after decades of resistance in both quiet and violent forms began to accept Catholicism, after seeing as a community the ways that the new spirituality was similar to the old.

This Saturday at 11 am in the UOG CLASS Lecture Hall, there will be a dialogue over the historical issues surrounding the Solorzano skull. UOG President and scholar Robert Underwood, UOG Anthropology professor David Atienza, Father Francis Hezel and myself will be on a panel to discuss the legacy of that conflict and also the way the tragedy of that time continues to ripple into the present. The Chamorro Spanish Wars was a pivotal point in terms of the trajectory of the Chamorros as a people. It remains something that is far distant for some, but still very intense and intimately present for others. Given the way that Chamorro culture has evolved to become closely intertwined with Catholicism, it is important that we look to that moment where this religion came into Guam and have stark, real, conversations about what took place. If you are able to, please come and join us on Satruday. The Solorzano skull will also be on display in the CLASS Lecture Hall from 12 pm – 1 pm.

Pay Raise News and Blues

$
0
0
The pay raise controversy is now largely moot, but it did bring up some very important points about governance and about the connection or lack of connection that people feel to their governments in a democracy. In a democratic society, the government is supposed to represent the people, but that responsibility that people have is sometimes rejected, primarily because people want to cover their apathy or their lack of engagement. They complain more ferociously because they are not engaged, because they may not actually know what is going on.

This does not mean that their critiques are not without merit, but only that they are often not very productive because the passion or conviction with which they are spoken has no bearing to how effective they are, or how much those critiquing actually understand. It was intriguing in this controversy to see how so many people would direct their ire to the Guam Legislature, simply because they were the ones doing the listening. They were the ones responding to the public's frustration, the ones meeting with them, even proposing legislation, and so because they offered these spaces for discussion, they ended up receiving the majority of the negative attention. The Governor's office in contrast, which was the one who compelled the Legislature to act on the issue, and made some of the more bewildering statements, was kept out of it, primarily because they were not engaging with the community over their concerns. It was also unfortunate how many people who were upset, were not aware that this conversation over pay raises has been going on for several years already.

At the core of this issue though was a lack of leadership by Guam's leaders. With a huge excess of funds, there should have been a conversation over what to do with this money. To implement these pay raises just a few weeks after an election smacks of everything that people loathe about Guam's government. It seems so odious, so political. Many of the people who complained felt like there should have been more thought given to the wider community. After all, if you compare the minimum wage increase for the island as a whole to the sometimes massive raises some elected officials are receiving (in addition to their retro pay), it seems and feels so wrong. This pay raise issue more than anything showed the way in which governments become their own entities and organisms and have their own internal logic, which can appall those on the outside. The government must take care of its own as well as everyone else, both in terms of electoral politics, but also to keep the government running smoothly.  With this extra money, an election just finished it seemed the perfect time to reward GovGuam employees for their hard work. Often times the span between election day and inauguration day is thought of as dead time, where there is nothing to do for politicians or when no one is watching. It becomes the perfect time to sneak things through, to pass things with less political risk.

Here are some articles, letters and editorials on the pay raise issue.

***********************

Repeal pay raises for elected officials
Letter to the editor
Guam PDN
1/3/15

Editor's note: The following is an edited, condensed version of testimony provided to the 32nd Guam Legislature.

In 2005 a bill was introduced and subsequently passed by the Legislature. It mandated that all public school children be required to conduct 75 hours of community service learning with the intent of, and I quote: "to allow each student to gain knowledge of the community's needs, to expand learning beyond the four walls of the classroom, to provide opportunities for lifelong intellectual and personal growth, and to feel the intrinsic rewards associated with giving back to society."

The bill was intended to foster a sense of community and altruism in our youth through the practice of public service or service learning. On Nov. 21, the governor and this Legislature removed the quality of altruism from public service and replaced it with a selfishness never seen before in the history of our island.

There is no polite way to put this, but the passage of Bill 32-208 represents the epitome of hypocrisy.
Evidence for that statement would be, the use of the word "deserve," by both branches of this government as justification for the increase in salaries. How does an elected official tell the next generation to give back to society, without expecting anything in return, while at the same time say, they deserve to be paid the highest compensation in the nation for serving the public?

Everyone needs to be paid, but if you, elected officials, say you deserve such high compensation for your good work, I ask you, how much?

Let's see, in 2011, senators' salaries went from $55,303 to $60,000 and just three years later from $60,000 to $85,000! That's an increase of almost 40 percent in three years. That does not include cashed out annual leave and other benefits. This begs the question: When will it be enough?

The top three highest-paid legislatures in the nation are as follows:

1. California, the third largest state with 38 million people. Legislative salary $90,000.
2. Guam, 30 square miles with a population of 168,000. Legislative salary $85,000.
3. Pennsylvania, with 12.77 million people. Legislative salary $84,000

If a more closer comparison needs to be made relative to cultural, social and cost of living issues, then let's take Hawaii, with 1.4 million people and a legislative salary of $57,852.

Public servants in many jurisdictions throughout the United States are just as committed, talented and hardworking as you, but don't say they deserve to be paid such an insane amount money to help their people. As a matter of fact, 41 out of 50 state legislatures' (members) receive under $50,000 a year! Some only receive a couple of hundred dollars a year! So I ask, what makes you so special?

Good senators of Guam, it is unconscionable to expect to be paid such high salary levels when the community and its people continue to endure substandard results on social and economic issues facing the island. Here are a few examples:

• There are 48,000 people on Guam who receive some form of public assistance;
• There are 1,500 homeless individuals/families on Guam and it increases every year;
• There are panhandlers on almost every major intersection on Guam;
• There is an increase of violent crime and a proliferation of methamphetamine abuse on Guam;
• Future generations are straddled with debt borrowed by this government to pay tax returns and other liabilities incurred by the government and its leaders; and
• We have a public hospital that is constantly on the brink of bankruptcy;

The list goes on and on.

I support the bill to reduce legislative salaries, but it does not go far enough. I recommend that (it) include the executive branch as well, because the integrity and spirit of public service does not stop with this branch.

Many state governors often refuse to take a salary or they out-right return their salaries to the people. Our governor's salary level of $130,000 is higher than 21 state governors.

When one of the richest men on Guam, who just happens to be the governor, says he deserves more money for helping the people, then the spirit and integrity of public service is definitely in trouble.
I further recommend that any future salary increases ... be put before the people in the form of a public referendum.

I implore you to return the people's money and use it to help the people. Restore the spirit and integrity of public service that has been entrusted to you by the people of Guam.

Andri Baynum is a resident of Harmon.
 
 
************************
 
Horrible: Elected official lined pockets with cash as community suffers
Editorial
Guam PDN
1/5/15

Our community is disappointed and appalled by the failure of the senators in 32nd Guam Legislature to pass legislation repealing their pay raises before the end of the term. Bill 436-32 failed in a 10-3 vote last Thursday.

Sens. Frank Aguon Jr., Michael San Nicolas and Mike Limtiaco were the only three lawmakers who supported the legislation. Sen. Brant McCreadie was absent.

Senators in the 33rd Legislature, especially new members, have an opportunity to make this right and mustn't fail the community.

It's was wrong for Gov. Eddie Calvo and senators to approve pay raises and retroactive payments for themselves while shortchanging or ignoring the government's ongoing fiscal problems. They put themselves, and their bank accounts, above the community's most pressing needs.

San Nicolas, who has publicly opposed the raises, has said he will reintroduce a bill to repeal those raises in the new term.

But even worse than the pay raises was the issuance of retroactive pay back to January 2014. Senators each got $14,000. Calvo's retroactive pay was about $22,000. Lt. Gov. Ray Tenorio got about $15,000 in retroactive pay.

When they wrongly decided to give themselves unjustified pay raises, there was no reason to for elected officials to give themselves retroactive pay. They could have just made the new pay scales effective starting in 2015. Instead, they decided to line their pockets with cash.

San Nicolas donated his $14,000 to Sanctuary Inc., a local nonprofit that has been shortchanged by the local government in previous years.

We applaud San Nicolas for standing up for the community, and for opposing the pay raises and retroactive pay. We await his new bill to repeal pay raises for senators, the governor and lieutenant governor.


*******************

Revoke: Government senators failing community by prioritizing pay raises.
Editorial
Guam PDN
December 18, 2014

Actions by Gov. Eddie Calvo and lawmakers to prioritize their pay raises over the island's critical needs are a disservice to the community. Those raises should be revoked.

What's worse is that elected officials approved giving themselves retroactive pay to January. In the case of senators, the Legislature must now find additional money or take money from other parts of its budget to cover $400,000 in retroactive salaries. None of this was considered by lawmakers before passing the pay raises.


Sen. Frank Aguon has introduced a bill to repeal the pay raises for senators. Bill 436 would exclude senators from the raise while preserving raises for the governor, lieutenant governor, attorney general and Cabinet members. Senators last week voted to reject a bill by Sen. Mike San Nicolas that would have repealed all of those raises.


There is absolutely no legitimate justification for raising the salaries of lawmakers, the governor and lieutenant governor, especially in light of more pressing and critical community needs. Senators also failed this community by not holding any public hearings on legislation to increase pay for elected officials.

For the past decade, elected officials have refused to accept reality and constantly spend far beyond the government's means, all while refusing to prioritize critical services. This has led to multiple bond-borrowing efforts that have placed the burden of elected officials' irresponsibility on the backs of future generations. Meanwhile, GovGuam has a growing list of mandates, obligations and critical needs it must fulfill.

Crime is up and we need more patrol officers. The prison is overcrowded, can't provide adequate medical services to inmates and lacks corrections officers. Guam Memorial Hospital can't pay its bills and doesn't get enough funding. Our schools are deteriorating and are constant victims of vandalism and break-ins. The mass transit system is still broken. The list goes on and on.

Until these community needs are met, it's irresponsible and shameful for Calvo and senators to commit taxpayer money to fund their pay raises while continuing to shortchange the rest of the island.

***************************

Raises for administration are wrong
Letter to the Editor
Guam PDN
12/23/14

The Calvo-Tenorio team through the actions of Lt. Gov. Ray Tenorio proposed an unprecedented across-the-board pay increase for the governor, lieutenant governor and their cabinet. This shady proposal is the administration's Christmas bonus to their cabinet for their landslide gubernatorial victory.

If this is the right direction (possible) gubernatorial candidate Tenorio is headed to in 2018, we the people need to change directions. The proa has sunk and the loot from GovGuam's coffers banked by this covetous team and their cabinet.

Retroactive pay is not just compensation for work done in a meritorious manner, nor does it create equity. It's a sign of the times that the middle class has now been elevated to the upper class and the lower class downgraded to below-poverty levels.

When people are judged by merit and not connections, people will work hard and everyone will benefit, not just the select few chosen from this administration. Rewarding yourself with raises from the people of Guam's empty coffers for work you judge as deserving and good is irresponsible, contemptible and corrupt.

GovGuam is not the Calvo-Tenorio enterprise. It is the people of Guam's. If we the people cannot trust our highest leaders, the governor and lieutenant governor to do the job they're supposed to -- promote our common welfare -- we have lost.

In these times when test scores are so low because Guam DOE can't afford to give their students a decent education and textbooks or even safe schools and physical education; when this administration refused to increase the minimum wage to a living wage for our impoverished workers; when the price of water was increased almost 20 percent; when southern residents have had to deal with unsafe road hazards; when crime is at an all- time high; when the price of imported goods and inflation increased substantively; when GMH is nearing pay-less paydays and the basic medicines unavailable; when our correction system is overcrowded; when health care is a privilege for the wealthy; when public health is unprepared for an epidemic; when our homeless population is at the highest ever; when the wait list for public housing spans five years; when our people are suffering from the elderly to the children -- the governor gave himself a $40,000 raise.

This is the me-first, not the people-first, movement. The $111 million in Section 30 federal funds was not allotted for raises, but basic necessities -- health, education, justice, public safety and housing.
Maria Cruz is a resident of Malesso.

******************

San Nicolas Sends FOIA Requests to Account for Retro Pay Outs to Elected Officials and Political Appointees; San Nicolas Office Vandalized
Pacific News Center
12/23/14

Senator Michael F.Q. San Nicolas sent a FOIA request yesterday to the Department of Administration, Speaker Won Pat and others for the retro payment amounts and the names of the individuals the payments were made to.  
“We have the right to know who got how much,” said Senator San Nicolas.  “A full accounting of the amount of retro payments paid out to elected officials and political appointees have not yet been made public.”

It was during the session floor debate on Senator San Nicolas’s Bill 435-32 to repeal the raises and retro payment that Senator San Nicolas showed that the raise amounts for Governor and Lt. Governor were significantly higher than the actual amounts recommended by the Hay study and that there was no Hay study recommendation for any Senatorial salary increase.

“If the Hay study recommendations were not followed for elected officials, it throws all the raises and retro payments for elected officials and political appointees as passed in Public Law 32-208 into question.  We have the right to know how much of a retro payment each of the political appointees and elected officials got.”
Senator San Nicolas came into his office this morning to find it had been vandalized.  A large rock had thrown through the window right by Senator San Nicolas’s desk, leaving a large hole and shattering the window.  A police report was filed about the incident.  Nothing was taken in the office.

Senator San Nicolas is asking anyone with any information about the parties responsible for this vandalism to call either the police or Senator San Nicolas’s office at 472-6453.
***********************
A Good Day to be a Politician
Editorial
Monday, 24 Nov 2014 03:00am
VARIETY NEWS STAFF
ON FRIDAY, two and a half weeks after Election Day, the Guam Legislature voted itself and other top government officials hefty pay raises. The legislation was introduced by the governor who will receive a 44 percent increase in salary to $130,000. The legislature was called into special session by the lieutenant governor in his capacity as acting governor; the legislation provides a 29 percent raise to the lieutenant governor who now receives $110,000.

All members of the legislature who were present Friday voted for the pay increase except Sen. Michael Limtiaco, the only senator who did not run for re-election. The senators received a $20,000 or 31 percent increase in salary to $85,000. The increase will make them the second highest paid state or territorial legislators under the United States flag, behind only the California lawmakers who are paid $91,525.

Also to receive substantial increases with the enactment of Bill 1(8-S) are the governor’s appointed Cabinet members – more than 80 directors, deputy directors and others with similar titles. The public auditor, her staff and the attorney general of Guam will also be paid more as a result of the legislation.

The raises were among the Hay pay salary adjustments contained in the Competitive Wage Act of 2014 that was transmitted to the legislature by the governor on Jan. 15, about 11 months before the election. That bill also contained Hay pay salary adjustments for almost all classified line employees. After much legislative maneuvering, the majority members of this legislature passed legislation granting the salary increases for the classified employees, but set the salaries for the top officials – those impacted by the current legislation – at the level they were on Oct. 1, 2013.

At the time, we agreed with that action. We opined that the classified rank-and-file workers should be paid well enough to provide for themselves and their families as they provide needed government services. But the unclassified management-level government employees are paid well enough, some are more qualified for their positions than others and, in general, political public service should not be too lucrative.

In a statement announcing that he had called the legislature into special session last week to consider the bill, the lieutenant governor noted that Bill 1(8-S) contained the same proposed raises that had been rescinded earlier in the year and wrote, “This issue was politicized before the election ... .”

We assume he meant, correctly, that raises for top officials would not have been popular among voters and so the legislators acted in accordance with what they perceived the view of the people. But the election is over and they are the victors.

Kirby Delauter

$
0
0
Gof na'chalek este. Ti hu tungo' hafa bei sangan, esta sen na'chalek sin commentary. 
 
Hu na'chechetton magi un editorial put Si Kirby Delauter. Este muna'chalek yu' mas kinu todu i otro na editorials siha ni hu taitai gi lina'la'-hu. 
 
Taitai mas, ya siempre para un komprende. 
 
***************
 "Kirby Delauter, who didn't want his name in a news story, is now a story"
Krishnadev Calamur 
NPR.org
1/6/15
Update at 9:21 a.m. ET, Jan. 8

We reported Wednesday evening that Frederick County, Md., Council Member Kirby Delauter has apologized. You can find that story here.

Our original post:

Frederick County, Md., Council Member Kirby Delauter threatened a local reporter with a lawsuit for using his name in a story without permission.

Delauter was mentioned exactly once in that article about parking issues. We could explain what he said in his Facebook post on Monday; instead we'll just point you to the screen grab, captured by The Washington Post.
A screen grab shows the Facebook post by Kirby Delauter claiming a newspaper used his name "without authorization."
Screen grab from The Washington Post
Delauter's original post appears to have been removed.

Well, today, the Frederick News-Postresponded, in an an editorial, which is in the form of an acrostic, originally scheduled to be published next Sunday. Its headline: "Kirby Delauter, Kirby Delauter, Kirby Delauter."

The piece's tone is tongue-in-cheek. Here's an excerpt:
"Knowing Councilman Kirby Delauter as we do, we weren't surprised that he threatened The Frederick News-Post with a lawsuit because we had, he says — and we're not making this up — been putting Kirby Delauter's name in the paper without Kirby Delauter's authorization. Attorneys would be called, Kirby Delauter said.
"In fact, we spent quite some time laughing about it. Kirby Delauter, an elected official; Kirby Delauter, a public figure? Surely, Kirby Delauter can't be serious? Kirby Delauter's making a joke, right?"
Do head over to the Frederick News-Post for the full editorial. It's worth the read.


***************

Kirby Delauter, Kirby Delauter, Kirby Delauter
Editorial
Frederick News-Post
1/6/15


Knowing Councilman Kirby Delauter as we do, we weren't surprised that he threatened The Frederick News-Post with a lawsuit because we had, he says — and we're not making this up — been putting Kirby Delauter's name in the paper without Kirby Delauter’s authorization. Attorneys would be called, Kirby Delauter said.

In fact, we spent quite some time laughing about it. Kirby Delauter, an elected official; Kirby Delauter, a public figure? Surely, Kirby Delauter can't be serious? Kirby Delauter’s making a joke, right?

Round about then, we wondered, if it’s not a joke, how should we now refer to Kirby Delauter if we can't use his name (Kirby Delauter)? Could we get away with an entire editorial of nothing but “Kirby Delauter” repeated over and over again -- Kirby Delauter, Kirby Delauter, Kirby Delauter? OK, imagine we agreed because of temporary madness or something funny in the water that week, how would we reference "Kirby Delauter" and do our job as journalists without running afoul of our lack of authorization?

Blanks? Sure, we sometimes use hyphens in the case of expletives. Perhaps we could do that: "K---- D-------." Or, perhaps, "Councilman [Unauthorized]." We giggled a bit more than we should have when we came up with "the Councilman Formerly Known as Commissioner Kirby Delauter," which doesn't seem as funny written down in black and white and includes his name, which defeats the point. Maybe we should just put his initials, "KD," with an asterisk to a footnote (KD*), or refer to him as GLAT, the acronym for his campaign: "Govern Like A Taxpayer." We could even make it sound a little hip-hop with a well-placed hyphen: G-Lat. Speaking of, could we get away with "K-Del"? Or we could simply go with the Harry Potter-esque "He Who Shall Not be Named." (Cue the lightning strike and peal of thunder.)

Yet we could take the low road down even further and childishly mangle "Kirby Delauter" into references you, the reader, would still understand. "Sherbert Deluder," say. Or "Derby Kelauter.""Shirley Delaughter" (and don't call me Shirley). We found a great automatic online anagrammer that generated all kinds of alternatives and could make it a challenge for our readers to decode each time we have to reference the councilman: "Rebuked artily." That was a good one. "Bakery diluter" is just silly but does have a ring about it. "Keyed rural bit" was another that caught our eye as somewhat telling, because Kirby Delauter's pretty keyed up. We're sure there's a joke in "Brutelike Yard" somewhere.

Discernibly, though, Kirby Delauter's ignorance of what journalism is and does is no joke, and illustrates one disturbing aspect too prevalent in conservatives’ beliefs: That the media are all-liberal stooges hell bent on pursuing some fictional leftwing agenda. Generally this "fact" is bleated when the facts on the ground differ from conservative talking points. Take Councilman Billy Shreve's abstract, almost nonsensical defense of KD*: "I think media outlets are cowards and they hide behind the label of journalists and that's a bully pulpit to expand their liberal” agenda. Cowards? Tell that to the families of the 60 journalists killed in 2014, or the 70 in 2013, or the 74 who died in 2012, according to the Committee to Protect Journalists. All in pursuit of the truth, or the most reliable version of it at hand in the most dangerous regions of the world.

Edifying as it may be to lapse into name calling -- and yes, we allowed ourselves a little childishness above and maybe a little bit below -- we need to make one serious point the councilman needs to hear and understand: We will not bow to petty intimidation tactics because a local politician thinks he can score political points with his base throwing around empty threats.

Legally, Kirby Delauter has no case.

And why? Here's how Washington Post blogger Eugene Volokh, who "teaches free speech law, religious freedom law, church-state relations law, a First Amendment Amicus Brief Clinic, and tort law, at UCLA School of Law," nicely sums it up:

“Uh, Council Member: In our country, newspapers are actually allowed to write about elected officials (and others) without their permission. It’s an avantgarde experiment, to be sure, but we’ve had some success with it." You know, that whole First Amendment thing.

That's why we're taking his threat with a pinch of salt. We've seen this behavior before (not just from Kirby Delauter) and it’s worth highlighting again. Bullying seems to be the only way Kirby "Don't say my name" Delauter feels he can lead. Only now, the target is not the public at hearings or occasional "punk" staff member, an arrogant, self-serving, whining middle school teacher or fellow "moron" commissioner, it's The News-Post. Instead of taking his job seriously like the voters demanded and the rest of the council seem to grasp, he's grabbing at distractionary shoot-the-messenger tactics that make a lot of noise but, to quote Shakespeare, a man who knew drama when he saw it, noise that "signifies nothing." Frederick County has big issues to tackle in 2015 and we have yet to hear Kirby Delauter sound out one single, sensible idea. He used the word "govern" in his slogan. Maybe he should apply that to his temper first.

Enough. Seriously. What's Kirby Delauter going to do? Sue everyone who's making fun of him on Twitter using the #kirbydelauter hashtag, or on Facebook? Boy, his attorney will be able to retire off that.

Reasonable men (and women) are required to move Frederick County forward. All Kirby Delauter is doing yet again is displaying his inability to control his temper, embarrassing himself, his district, the county and those who voted him into office. If he wants to govern like a taxpayer, he needs to respect the taxpayers whose money provides his paycheck, stop this silly, inflammatory nonsense, and get to work.

Colonialism as told through flowers

$
0
0
For me the idea that Guam is a colonized place is so obvious that I often times have to atan puyitos anyone who is confused by this comment. There is so much evidence around us and even inside of us at any given moment, that it doesn't seem possible that someone could try to argue otherwise. You could try to argue that it being colonized isn't that bad and that it is actually good since Guam is helpless and pathetic without someone else telling it how to live its life, but this is different than simply denying that colonialism exists. This position is one of apologizing or justifying colonization in the name of helping a poor, tiny island that can't survive otherwise.

Those who act like Guam isn't or can't be colonized usually don't know much about Guam and the fact that they take this position is usually exhibit A in their class action lawsuit of ignorance. But what is hysterical is the way they don't admit to this lack of knowledge and try to pretend that the simplicity in which they see the world just simply doesn't allow for what you must be saying. As more than one person has said to me in terms of Guam's continuing colonization, "I just don't see it." As if somehow referencing their ability to visually process data they don't like is somehow a slam dunk form of evidence.

The other day I had one such encounter. A woman was arguing that Guam can't be colonized because she doesn't believe it or see it. She tried to substitute her love for America as evidence that colonialism doesn't exist, even though I can't see any actual connection between these two points. I did my best not to laugh at her when I argued that Guam is a very colonized place and there is plenty of evidence around us to make this point. I rattled off a list of things to consider, chief amongst them was "history" and the way that Chamorros and their view of history has been colonized.

She countered saying "how can history be colonized?" History is just history, it is just what happened, how can you say it is colonized? In my mind, a deep booming announced voice broadcast across my cognitive map "Challenge Accepted,"

I responded to the woman that proving that our history is colonized and that we are colonized is easy. I asked her a single, simple question. As a Chamorro woman, when you look at our history, of all the possible people, figures in our 4000 year history, who do you think was the most important? Who do you think is the one that Chamorros should really celebrate and honor?

I had in my mind the answer she would probably give, and I was absolutely right. When she responded with "Magellan" I immediately jumped in and told her, "congratulations, you are colonized." That is the ultimate colonized Chamorro answer.

But colonization doesn't only affect how we see history, it can affect the way we see things around us today. A case in point is a poster that I have titled "Flowers of Guam." When we look at the way our island is represented or the way we imagine our paradisical island today, there are always flowers there. In flower leis, on trees, adorning the bodies of beautiful brown people. So many of these flowers were very recently introduced to Guam, and many of them, despite seeming to be beautiful, are actually danger invasive weeds that choke out other plants. Other than their mere introduction, there is another way that we can perceive the colonization of Guam through flowers. Colonization is a process that can disassociate you from the things around you, somehow imagine that things from far away, generally which come from the colonizer are better, more appropriate and better represent who you are, even if they historically have nothing to do with you. It can make the things which have been around you for centuries or millenia appear to be unfamiliar and strange, such is the case of what happened to our ancestors with regards to canoes, latte and so many other things. We have a similar case with the flower the "guasali" or "gaosali." There has been a movement recently to change Guam's official flower to the gaosali, as it has been here probably as long as Chamorros have and so it is a native flower. The Puti Tainobiu is a more recently introduced flower, but was made the official flower for Guam several decades ago. The people who have been pushing for this issue are primarily biologists and scientists, who feel that a flower that is deeply connected to the land, but still beautiful should be the flower of Guam, not an invasive species that arrived recently.

The colonization comes into play because of the general resistance that emerged when this possible change was announced. People with little knowledge of Guam's history or even the flowers that they were discussing, came out forcefully against the gaosali representing Guam. Even when faced with the possibility of reconnecting or learning something that has been lost, that has been made unfamiliar to you, many still resist and don't want to know it or learn it, because of the persistence of colonial desire.

10 Years

$
0
0
I completely neglected this during the past year, even though I would remember it every once in a while.

2014 was the ten-year anniversary of the starting of this blog, "No Rest for the Awake - Minagahet Chamorro."

I first began it in 2004, while I was preparing for graduate school in San Diego, California.

At that time I was running several websites with the help of a few other people, some of whom I haven't been in contact with for close to ten years.

It was a place for me to vent thoughts, share ideas, get the word out about things. It has been by now something that countless high school, middle school and college students use for their research papers. It is something that even other scholars have used on occasion for theoretical points.

I have posted on this blog 2121 times and it has been visited over 900,000 times.

Over the course of this blog's life I have had two children, finished a Ph.D., lost both my grandmothers, testified at the United Nations twice amongst so many other things.

I think in honor of this blog and its life thus far, I'll start a new one, with a few other friends. Check back here soon for more information on it.



Viewing all 862 articles
Browse latest View live